2022
DOI: 10.2196/32747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Teaching in Medical Education: Scientific Literature Landscape Review

Abstract: Background Digital teaching in medical education has grown in popularity in the recent years. However, to the best of our knowledge, no bibliometric report to date has been published that analyzes this important literature set to reveal prevailing topics and trends and their impacts reflected in citation counts. Objective We used a bibliometric approach to unveil and evaluate the scientific literature on digital teaching research in medical education, d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al., 2021). Digital teaching could increase learning satisfaction, knowledge gain, and even cost-effectiveness (Yeung, et. al., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., 2021). Digital teaching could increase learning satisfaction, knowledge gain, and even cost-effectiveness (Yeung, et. al., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the post-epidemic classroom, digital teaching and learning is seen as more of a blended approach. Here, digital education is employed in conjunction with conventional techniques [ 29 ]. Despite being widely acknowledged by students, it had no appreciable impact on final exam scores when compared to conventional instruction [ 30 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, students and clinicians have already been widely consulting YouTube as a learning tool, such that it is the most frequently used educational video source for anatomical knowledge [ 12 ] and medical surgery preparation [ 13 ]. Being open access and having non-peer-reviewed user-contributed contents, YouTube contains very good materials for healthcare education, but also potentially much misinformation/inaccurate information [ 14 , 15 ]. A recent literature review has reported that online social platforms could positively affect anatomy education, with YouTube being the most investigated platform followed by Facebook and Twitter [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%