Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The consequences of Industry 4.0 have adverse side effects on cybercrime growth, which requires creating an effective cybersecurity system for companies. Therefore, this study aims to develop a composite indicator of company cybersecurity to assess its development needs. For this purpose, the authors modified Porter’s method by constructing a superposition matrix based on the growth rates of cyber threats and risks, calculating their quantitative characteristics and a composite indicator. The computations are based on indicators for 2016-2022 characterizing cybersecurity vulnerabilities and the consequences of cyber threats: the share of companies experiencing one, six or more successful cyberattacks, considering the likely and very likely success of cyberattacks on them in the next 12 months, security threat and concern indices, the share of companies with a growing security budget affected by ransomware and experiencing a shortage of skilled IT security personnel, the cost of stolen or compromised credentials. As a result, cybersecurity needs increased significantly for 2020-2022, mainly due to digital transformation and the cyber threats growth after the COVID-19 pandemic. A comparative analysis of the proposed indicator with those characterizing the development of Industry 4.0 showed that the need for a reliable cybersecurity system is much more important than the active development of modern technologies. Spending on IT is also increasing, but not enough to meet the needs of cybersecurity development, except for the 2022 results. The proposed indicator is defined for companies worldwide, but its versatility allows the methodology to be applied to enterprises of various industries and sizes.
The consequences of Industry 4.0 have adverse side effects on cybercrime growth, which requires creating an effective cybersecurity system for companies. Therefore, this study aims to develop a composite indicator of company cybersecurity to assess its development needs. For this purpose, the authors modified Porter’s method by constructing a superposition matrix based on the growth rates of cyber threats and risks, calculating their quantitative characteristics and a composite indicator. The computations are based on indicators for 2016-2022 characterizing cybersecurity vulnerabilities and the consequences of cyber threats: the share of companies experiencing one, six or more successful cyberattacks, considering the likely and very likely success of cyberattacks on them in the next 12 months, security threat and concern indices, the share of companies with a growing security budget affected by ransomware and experiencing a shortage of skilled IT security personnel, the cost of stolen or compromised credentials. As a result, cybersecurity needs increased significantly for 2020-2022, mainly due to digital transformation and the cyber threats growth after the COVID-19 pandemic. A comparative analysis of the proposed indicator with those characterizing the development of Industry 4.0 showed that the need for a reliable cybersecurity system is much more important than the active development of modern technologies. Spending on IT is also increasing, but not enough to meet the needs of cybersecurity development, except for the 2022 results. The proposed indicator is defined for companies worldwide, but its versatility allows the methodology to be applied to enterprises of various industries and sizes.
The volatility in the business environment requires innovation, and to keep up with technological advancements, leaders must determine whether to encourage organizational transformation into digitalization. Therefore, the study aims to explore and bridge the existing gaps by integrating the relationship between digital technology, transformational leadership, and agility association to enhance organizational performance. The authors employed a quantitative approach, utilizing the structural equation model with Partial Least Squares, to evaluate the hypotheses by administering a questionnaire to 207 respondents in Indonesia from August 2022 to November 2022. The study period choice is justified by recognizing the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on how individuals perceive aspects like digital technology adoption, leadership, and agility. Indonesia’s dynamic economy and diverse industries with unique socio-cultural characteristics make it an ideal setting to explore how digital technology, transformational leadership, and agility impact organizational performance. This study demonstrated that digital technology positively influenced the agility and performance of an organization, respectively. Subsequently, the authors found that transformational leadership positively influenced digital technology, agility, and organizational performance. In addition, this study disclosed that agility positively influenced organizational performance. Further, our investigation discovered the mediating role of agility in the correlation between digital technology and organizational performance and between transformational leadership and organizational performance. Finally, digital technology was able to act as the mediator in the correlation between transformational leadership and agility, as well as between transformational leadership and organizational performance. This study brings practical implications for leaders by investing in digital technology and fostering transformational leadership, which could make an organization more agile, innovative, competitive, and better equipped to navigate volatility in the business environment. This study also emphasizes the need to increase the number of subjects related to technology in academics to ensure a better understanding of the role of digitalization because today’s life heavily depends on technology. The study develops a novel perspective for subsequent studies on the interplay of digital technology and transformational leadership on agility and organizational performance.
Adeyemo, K. A., Isiavwe, D., Adetula, D., Olamide, O., & Folashade, O. (2020). Mandatory adoption of the Central Bank of Nigeria’s cashless and e-payment policy: implications for bank customers. Banks and Bank Systems, 15(2), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(2).2020.21 Barabashev, A., Makarov, I., & Zarochintcev, S. (2022). How to shape government policies on high-technology development using the indicative evaluation of risks? Administratie si Management Public, 38, 70-89. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2022.38-04 Bayram, M., & Akat, M. (2019). Market-Neutral Trading with Fuzzy Inference, a New Method for the Pairs Trading Strategy. Engineering Economics, 30(4), 411-421. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.30.4.14350 Bing, C., & Schectman, J. (2019). Inside the UAE’s secret hacking team of American mercenaries. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-spying-raven/ (31.01.2023). Bozhenko, V. (2022). Tackling corruption in the health sector. Health Economics and Management Review, 3(3), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.21272/hem.2022.3-03 Bozhenko, V. V., Lyeonov, S. V., Polishchuk, E. A., Boyko, A. O., & Artyukhova, N. O. (2022). Identification of determinants of corruption in government: a mar-spline approach. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 6, 176-180. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-6/176 Bozhenko, V., Mynenko, S., & Shtefan, A. (2022b). Financial Fraud Detection on Social Networks Based on a Data Mining Approach. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 6(4), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.6(4).119-124.2022 Caballero-Morales, S.-O., Cordero Guridi, J. de J., Alvarez-Tamayo, R. I., & Cuautle-Gutiérrez, L. (2020). EDUCATION 4.0 to support entrepreneurship, social development and education in emerging economies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 8(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.37335/ijek.v8i2.119 Chen, Y., Xu, S., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). China’s digital economy development: incentives and challenges. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 29(2), 518-538. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.18018 Ćwiklicki, M., & Wojnarowska, M. (2020). Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: One-Way or Two-way Relationships? Engineering Economics, 31(4), 387-397. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.31.4.24565 DavidPur, N. (2022). Which Countries are Most Dangerous? Cyber Attack Origin – by Country. Retrieved from: https://blog.cyberproof.com/blog/which-countries-are-most-dangerous (31.01.2023). Dečman, M., Stare, J., & Klun, M. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the development of the information society in Slovenia. Administratie si Management Public, 39, 77-96. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2022.39-05 Deutsche Welle (2022). Ukrainian websites hacked in 'global attack'. Retrieved from: https://www.dw.com/en/ukraine-government-websites-hacked-in-global-attack/a-60421475 (31.01.2023). Dluhopolskyi, O., Pakhnenko, O., Lyeonov, S., Semenog, A., Artyukhova, N., Cholewa-Wiktor, M., & Jastrzębski, W. (2023). Digital financial inclusion: COVID-19 impacts and opportunities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3), 2383. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032383 Economist Intelligence (2023). Democracy Index. Retrieved from: https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2022/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=paid-search&utm_campaign=democracy-index-2022&gclid=CjwKCAjwgqejBhBAEiwAuWHioAEruOQA25JyHg-61MBEiYNJp9hvu3Pf91E_tWO2W0nauZ6on003ORoC6UsQAvD_BwE (31.01.2023). E-Governance Academy (2023). National Cyber Security Index. Retrieved from: https://ncsi.ega.ee/ncsi-index/ (31.01.2023). Fobel, P., & Kuzior, A. (2019). The future (Industry 4.0) is closer than we think. Will it also be ethical? Paper presented at the AIP Conference Proceedings, 2186. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5137987 Glova, J., Bernatik, W., & Tulai, O. (2020). Determinant Effects of Political and Economic Factors on Country Risk: An Evidence from the EU Countries. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 16(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2020.16-1.3 Gontareva, I., Babenko, V., Kuchmacz, B., & Arefiev, S. (2020). Valuation of information resources in the analysis of cybersecurity entrepreneurship. Estudios De Economia Aplicada, 38(4), https://doi.org/10.25115/EEA.V38I4.3984 Gupta, A., & Mishra, M. (2022). Ethical Concerns While Using Artificial Intelligence in Recruitment of Employees. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(2), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.6(2).6-11.2022 Gurbanov, N., Yagublu, N., Akbarli, N., & Niftiyev, I. (2022). Digitalization and the Covid-19-led public crisis management: an evaluation of financial sustainability in the Azerbaijan business sector. SocioEconomic Challenges, 6(3), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.6(3).23-38.2022 Institute for Economics and Peace (2022). Global Terrorism Index 2022. Retrieved from: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/global-terrorism-index-2022 (31.01.2023). Kaspersky (2023). Cyberthreat real-time map. Retrieved from: https://cybermap.kaspersky.com/ (31.01.2023). Krebs, B. (2021). At Least 30,000 U.S. Organizations Newly Hacked Via Holes in Microsoft’s Email Software. Retrieved from: https://krebsonsecurity.com/2021/03/at-least-30000-u-s-organizations-newly-hacked-via-holes-in-microsofts-email-software/ (31.01.2023). Kumar, N., & Kumar, J. (2019). Efficiency 4.0 for Industry 4.0. Human Technology, 15(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.201902201608 Kurniawati, E., Kohar, U.H.A., & Pirzada, K. (2022). Change or destroy: the digital transformation of Indonesian MSMES to achieve sustainable economy. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 26(2), 248-264. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2022.26.2.15 Kuzior, A., & Kwilinski, A. (2022). Cognitive technologies and artificial intelligence in social perception. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 30(2), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2022-0014 Kuzmenko, O., Šuleř, P., Lyeonov, S., Judrupa, I., & Boiko, A. (2020). Data mining and bifurcation analysis of the risk of money laundering with the involvement of financial institutions. Journal of International Studies, 13(3), 332-339. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-3/22 Lăzăroiu, G., Androniceanu, A., Grecu, I., Grecu, G., & Neguriță, O. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, Internet of Things sensing networks, and sustain-able cyber-physical management systems in big data-driven cognitive manufacturing. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(4), 1047-1080. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.030 Lucas, G. (2016). Ethics and Cyber Warfare: The Quest for Responsible Security in the Age of Digital Warfare. Oxford University Press. Lyulyov, O., Lyeonov, S., Tiutiunyk, I., & Podgórska, J. (2021). The impact of tax gap on macroeconomic stability: Assessment using panel VEC approach. Journal of International Studies, 14(1), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-1/10 Mačiulytė-Šniukienė, A., Butkus, M., & Davidavičienė, V. (2022). Development of the model to examine the impact of infrastructure on economic growth and convergence. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(3), 731-753. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.17140 Melnyk, L., Derykolenko, O., Kubatko, O., & Matsenko, O. (2019). Business models of reproduction cycles for digital economy. Paper presented at the CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2393, 269-276. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85069504652&origin=resultslist Melnyk, L., Kubatko, O., Piven, V., Klymenko, K., & Rybina, L. (2021). Digital and economic transformations for sustainable development promotion: A case of OECD countries. Environmental Economics, 12(1), 140-148. https://doi.org/10.21511/EE.12(1).2021.12 Millia, H., Adam, P, Muhatlib, A. A., & Tajuddin and Pasrun, Y. P. (2022). The Effect of Inward Foreign Direct Investment and Information and Communication Technology on Economic Growth in Indonesia. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 14(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2022.140106 Mnohoghitnei, I., Horobeț, A., & Belașcu, L. (2022). Bitcoin is so Last Decade-How Decentralized Finance (DeFi) could Shape the Digital Economy. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 14(1), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.24818/ejis.2022.01 Numbeo (2023). Crime Index by Country 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp?title=2022 (31.01.2023). Orlov, V., Bukhtiarova, A., Marczuk, M., & Heyenko, M. (2021). International economic and social determinants of the state economic security: A causal analysis. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(4), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(4).2021.24 Pakhnenko, O., & Kuan, Z. (2023). Ethics of Digital Innovation in Public Administration. Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(1), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.7(1).113-121.2023 Pakhnenko, O., Rubanov, P., Girzheva, O., Ivashko, L., Britchenko, I., & Kozachenko, L. (2022). Cryptocurrency: Value formation factors and investment risks. Journal of Information Technology Management, 14, 179-200. https://doi.org/10.22059/JITM.2022.88896 Perlroth, N., Scott, M, & Frenkel, S. (2017). Cyberattack Hits Ukraine Then Spreads Internationally. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/27/technology/ransomware-hackers.html (31.01.2023). Remeikienė, R., Ligita, G., Fedajev, A., Raistenskis, E., & Krivins, A. (2022). Links between crime and economic development: EU classification. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17(4), 909-938. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.031 Rousseeuw, P.J. (1987). Silhouettes: a Graphical Aid to the Interpretation and Validation of Cluster Analysis. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 Safarov, G., Sadiqova, S., Urazayeva, M., & Abbasova, N (2022). Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of Innovative-Industrial Cluster Development in the Era of Digitalization. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 184-197. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.4-17 Șavga, L. (2019). Implementing the Smart Specialization Concept in the Republic of Moldova: Challenges and Initiatives. Journal of Research on Trade, Management and Economic Development, 6(2), 6-17. Şavga, L., & Baran, T. (2022). Boosting the process of smart specialization in the Republic of Moldova. Paper presented in Contemporary Issues in Economy and Technology (pp. 187-196). Shao, X., Wang, D., Li, X., & Shao, H. (2022). Impact of Internet technology on spatial technology heterogeneity: openness or convergence - evidence from provincial data in China. Transformations in Business & Economics, 21(2), 193-213. Shkolnyk, I., Frolov, S., Orlov, V., Datsenko, V., & Kozmenko, Y. (2022). The impact of financial digitalization on ensuring the economic security of a country at war: New measurement vectors. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 19(3), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.19(3).2022.11 Smith, E.T. (2013). Cyber warfare: a misrepresentation of the true cyber threat. American Intelligence Journal, 31(1), 82-85. Sobczak, A. (2022). Analysis of the Conditions Influencing the Assimilation of the Robotic Process Automation by Enterprises. Human Technology, 18(2), 143-190. doi: 10.14254/1795-6889.2022.18-2.4 Statista (2023). Most commonly reported cyber crime categories worldwide in 2022, by number of individuals affected. Retrieved from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/184083/commonly-reported-types-of-cyber-crime-global/ (31.01.2023). Stehel, V., Vochozka, M., Kliestik, T., & Bakes, V. (2019). Economic analysis of implementing VMI model using game theory. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(2), 253-272. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.013 Straková, J., Talíř, M., & Váchal, J. (2022). Opportunities and threats of digital transformation of business models in SMEs. Economics and Sociology, 15(3), 159-171. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2022/15-3/9 The Heritage Foundation (2023). 2023 Index of Economic Freedom. Retrieved from: https://www.heritage.org/index/download (31.01.2023). The World Bank (2023). Life expectancy at birth, total (years). Retrieved from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN (31.01.2023). Tiutiunyk, I. V., Zolkover, A. O., Lyeonov, S. V., & Ryabushka, L. B. (2022a). The impact of economic shadowing on social development: challenges for macroeconomic stability. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 1, 183-191. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-1/183 Tiutiunyk, I., Cieśliński, W., Zolkover, A., & Vasa, L. (2022b). Foreign direct investment and shadow economy: One-way effect or multiple-way causality? Journal of International Studies, 15(4), 196-212. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2022/15-4/12 Tran, L. Q. T., Phan, D. T., Herdon, M., & Kovacs, L. (2022). Assessing the Digital Transformation in Two Banks: Case Study in Hungary. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 14(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2022.140210 Transparency International (2023). Corruption_Perceptions_Index. Retrieved from: https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2021?gclid=CjwKCAjw67ajBhAVEiwA2g_jEPyd355cvDdhD7SdWVteYeer5WvV3BZFHMo-Ox6p3vXSGk9wKi4p4BoCRJgQAvD_BwE (31.01.2023). Tribune (2020). Major cyber attack by Indian intelligence identified: ISPR. Retrieved from: https://tribune.com.pk/story/2259193/major-cyber-attack-by-indian-intelligence-identified-ispr (31.01.2023). Tvaronaviciene, M., & Burinskas, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 significance to competition and the eu competition policy. Economics & Sociology, 13(3), 244-258. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-3/15 U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2016). Joint Statement from the Department of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security. Retrieved from: https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national (31.01.2023). Vasudevan, H. (2022). Management and Leadership in the Klang Valley IT Sector: Conceptual Approach. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 56-65. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.3-05 Vitvitskiy, S. S., Kurakin, O. N., Pokataev, P. S., Skriabin, O. M., & Sanakoiev, D. B. (2021). Peculiarities of cybercrime investigation in the banking sector of Ukraine: review and analysis. Banks and Bank Systems, 16(1), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(1).2021.07 Voo, J., Hemani, I., & Cassidy, D. (2022). National Cyber Power Index 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/CyberProject_National%20Cyber%20Power%20Index%202022_v3_220922.pdf (31.01.2023). Voronenko, I., Nehrey, M., Laptieva, A., Babenko, V., & Rohoza, K. (2022). National cybersecurity: Assessment, risks and trends. International Journal of Embedded Systems, 15(3), 226-238. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJES.2022.124854 Wang, Q., Chen, Y., Guan, H., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2022). Technological innovation efficiency in China: Dynamic evaluation and driving factors. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148321 Wisevoter (2023). Most Powerful Countries in the World. Retrieved from: https://wisevoter.com/country-rankings/most-powerful-countries-in-the-world/ (31.01.2023). World Happiness Report (2023). World Happiness Report 2022. Retrieved from: https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2022/ (31.01.2023). Yarovenko, H. (2020). Evaluating the threat to national information security. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(3).2020.17 Yarovenko, H., & Rogkova, M. (2022). Dynamic and bibliometric analysis of terms identifying the combating financial and cyber fraud system. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 6(3), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.6(3).93-104.2022 Yoshimori, H., & Yoshimori, M. (2022). An Education Gift – Integrated Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Skills – for Future Generations to Grow the Economy in the Digital Phase. SocioEconomic Challenges, 6(2), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.6(2).5-18.2022 Yu, Y., Xinxin, W., Ruoxi, L., & Tingting, Y. (2023). The Mediating Role of Human Capital in the Relationship between Education Expenditure and Science and Technology Innovation: Evidence from China. SocioEconomic Challenges, 7(1), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.7(1).129-138.2023 Zimaitis, I., Urbonavičius, S., Degutis, M., & Kaduškevičiūtė, V. (2022). Influence of trust and conspiracy beliefs on the disclosure of personal data online. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(3), 551-568. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.16119
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.