Digitalization, Industry Concentration, and Productivity in Germany

Abstract

This paper investigates the links of digitalization and industry concentration with labor productivity at the sectoral level in Germany. Combining data for digitalization and labor productivity from the EU KLEMS database with firm-level data from the CompNet and Orbis Bureau Van Dijk databases to construct industry concentration measures between 2000 and 2015, we show that (1) the German economy appears to have digitized since 2000, and (2) there is no clear-cut relationship between digitalization and market concentration at the industry level. Using a time and sector fixed effects model and controlling for capital intensity, however, we find evidence for (3) a positive effect of both lagged industry concentration and lagged digitalization on productivity at the sectoral level in Germany. This finding is robust to alternative measures of digitalization and industry concentration as well as to their interaction but sensitive to the sector sample and to scale effects from the capital intensity. We, therefore, cautiously conclude that recent technological change appears to have been labor-saving and that productivity-enhancing aspect of a partial “superstar firm” effect may be identified in the German economy, in particular in its manufacturing sector.

How Digital Transformation of Enterprises Can Improve Labor Productivity: Evidence from Chinese-Listed Companies

“…First, the introduction of digital information technology helps to improve the efficiency of matching information and production factors within the enterprise [16,18], thus eliminating information asymmetry [9] and effectively achieving the optimal allocation of resources. Second, digital transformation contributes to the efficiency of enterprise innovation [1,7,8], and the process by which enterprises upgrade technology, optimize processes and update products19, and thus achieving changes in labor production efficiency. Third, the information marginal effect of enterprise digital transformation.…”

“…These governance benefits provide the foundation for improving business efficiency. Akter [1], Ferschli [7], and Liu [8] further point out that the digital transformation of digital information technology-led firms is effective in improving productivity. However, scholars such as Acemoglu [10], Autor [11], and Zhang [12], who focus on the relationship between digital technology and labor competition, argue that the efficiency of workers in the digital era will be affected by technology and will have a negative effect on firm labor productivity.…”

“…Information technologies such as artificial intelligence, cloud computing, blockchain, and big data are rapidly emerging as core drivers of innovation development and efficiency change in the digital economy, and companies are looking to build digital governance systems through the introduction of digital information technologies to achieve improved performance and productivity. Available studies point out that the widespread use of digital information technologies such as AI, blockchain, cloud, and data analytics has improved companies' ability to innovate [1,2], optimize organizational structures [3,4], reduce operating costs [5,6], improved input-output efficiency [7,8] and enhanced matching and flow of information [9]. These governance benefits provide the foundation for improving business efficiency.…”

Market Structure and Competition During Economic Transformation

“…B. Bajgar et al, 2019;Calligaris et al, 2018Calligaris et al, , 2021Weche und Wagner, 2021;Ferschli et al, 2021). 1,7 1,6 1,5 1,4 1,3 1,2 1,1 1,…”

The Value of Knowledge in the Age of Globalization Challenges: Philosophical and Intellectual Context

“…The problem of improving the process of knowledge acquisition is highlighted in Poutanen (2022). At the same time, Ferschli et al (2021) characterised the importance of digitalisation changes in the system of transformation of social institutions of humanity. A similar problem is presented in Ghazy, Ghoneim & Lang (2022) and Porokhovskiy (2019).…”