2019
DOI: 10.1101/814954
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digitally Deconstructing Leaves in 3D Using X-ray Microcomputed Tomography and Machine Learning

Abstract: Premise of the study: X-ray microcomputed tomography (microCT) can be used to measure 3D leaf internal anatomy, providing a holistic view of tissue organisation. Previously, the substantial time needed for segmenting multiple tissues limited this technique to small datasets, restricting its utility for phenotyping experiments and limiting our confidence in the conclusion of these studies due to low replication numbers. Methods and Results:We present a Python codebase for random-forest machine learning segmenta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(b) MicroCT data acquisition Images were reconstructed using TomoPy [54] for all ALS samples or using the in-house reconstruction platform for SLS or APS samples. Reconstructed scans were processed using published methods [32,55], and image stacks were cropped to remove tissue that was dehydrated, damaged or contained artefacts from the imaging or reconstruction steps. The final stacks contained approximately 500-2000 eight-bit grayscale images (downsampled from 16 or 32-bit images).…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(b) MicroCT data acquisition Images were reconstructed using TomoPy [54] for all ALS samples or using the in-house reconstruction platform for SLS or APS samples. Reconstructed scans were processed using published methods [32,55], and image stacks were cropped to remove tissue that was dehydrated, damaged or contained artefacts from the imaging or reconstruction steps. The final stacks contained approximately 500-2000 eight-bit grayscale images (downsampled from 16 or 32-bit images).…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extract surface area and volumes, mesophyll cells, airspace, vasculature (combined veins and bundle sheath) and background (including the epidermis) were segmented using published methods [32,55] and ImageJ [57]. Airspace volume (V pores ), mesophyll cell volume (V cells ), both summing up to the total mesophyll volume (V mes ), vasculature volume (V veins ) and the surface area exposed to the intercellular airspace (SA mes ) were then extracted using published methods [32] with the ImageJ plugin BoneJ [58], or using a custom Python program [55] (https://github.com/plant-microcttools/leaf-traits-microct). SA mes /V mes is less sensitive to leaf thickness than the commonly measured S m , i.e.…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-dimensional anatomy and stomatal traits. We extracted the volume and surface area of leaf anatomical traits from the full segmented stacks 52 . We estimated the volumes of the epidermis (Vep), bundle sheath and transfusion tissue (VBS+TT), mesophyll cells (Vcell), mesophyll intercellular airspace (VIAS), resin ducts (Vresin), and veins (Vvein).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extract surface area and volumes, the final image stacks were first segmented using manual or automated methods of Théroux-Rancourt et al 26,48 to segment the mesophyll cells, the airspace, the vasculature (combined veins and bundle sheath), and the background (including the epidermis). For both methods, ImageJ 49 was used to segment or prepare the image stacks for segmentation.…”
Section: Leaf Trait Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%