2020
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.6305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digitally Fabricated Immediate Complete Dentures: Case Reports of Milled and Printed Dentures

Abstract: Milling complete dentures is becoming a popular option for clinicians because subtractive technology can make the fabrication of high-quality dentures faster and easier. Additive technology is one of the newest techniques for making complete dentures, and its primary advantage is that a printer is more financially accessible than a milling machine. Printing and milling technologies as methods for denture fabrication have similar steps and time frames for their processes. The production of immediate complete de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various benefits of DDs have previously been reported, such as improved surgeon/patient satisfaction, reduced number of visits and chair time, improved denture fit, improved ease of maintenance, greater consistency and durability of the prosthodontic appliances, ability to store digital information, reduced workload for technicians, and shorter fabrication time [34][35][36][37][38]. However, our results revealed that CDs were significantly better than DDs in terms of several assessment items related to patient satisfaction, in contrast to earlier case reports [21,22]. We believe that the primary reason for this result could be the difference in the manufacturing methods be-tween DDs fabricated using a milling machine and those fabricated using a 3D printer.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Various benefits of DDs have previously been reported, such as improved surgeon/patient satisfaction, reduced number of visits and chair time, improved denture fit, improved ease of maintenance, greater consistency and durability of the prosthodontic appliances, ability to store digital information, reduced workload for technicians, and shorter fabrication time [34][35][36][37][38]. However, our results revealed that CDs were significantly better than DDs in terms of several assessment items related to patient satisfaction, in contrast to earlier case reports [21,22]. We believe that the primary reason for this result could be the difference in the manufacturing methods be-tween DDs fabricated using a milling machine and those fabricated using a 3D printer.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, the fabrication of removable prostheses using CAD/CAM has been delayed [15]. Currently, CAD/CAM complete dentures are fabricated by two companies (AvaDent; Global Dental Science, Scottsdale, AZ and DENTCA; Dentca Inc., Los Angeles, CA), and these dentures are available for use in edentulous patients [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Both companies allow definitive dentures to be fabricated in a few visits, and the dental materials, techniques, and fabrication processes have been established and standardized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both CAM technologies offer clinically acceptable results faster than the traditional process. The additive manufacturing technique is more recent and has the advantage that a 3D printer is more affordable than a milling machine [59]. Furthermore, the 3D printing technology is advancing rapidly, with applications in many fields, including dental laboratories.…”
Section: Comparing the Additive Vs The Subtractive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These novel techniques allow the clinician the option to fabricate complete dentures in the office, in a laboratory, or at a centralized production center [ 13 ]. The practice of making complete removable dentures using subtractive technology has become very common and continues to spread, and the literature provides reports describing both fully digital and combinations of digital and conventional methods for their production [ 14 ]. However, no clinical reports have described complex clinical situations with patients presenting atrophic alveolar ridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%