Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2501988.2502056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DigiTaps

Abstract: Eyes-free input usually relies on audio feedback that can be difficult to hear in noisy environments. We present DigiTaps, an eyes-free number entry method for touchscreen devices that requires little auditory attention.To enter a digit, users tap or swipe anywhere on the screen with one, two, or three fingers. The 10 digits are encoded by combinations of these gestures that relate to the digits' semantics. For example, the digit 2 is input with a 2-finger tap. We conducted a longitudinal evaluation with 16 pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A simple comparison between ABTKA and other similar systems, ABTKA doesn't make users stick to points placed by the designer like BrailleTouch and it allows the user to touch the screen dynamically in the position he is more comfortable with. Unlike Digitaps (Azenkot, et al, 2013), ABTKA supports typing digits and alphabets. Another advantage is that ABTKA is considered faster than BrailleType, since the user can make one touch interaction with the required fingers at the same time in order to type.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A simple comparison between ABTKA and other similar systems, ABTKA doesn't make users stick to points placed by the designer like BrailleTouch and it allows the user to touch the screen dynamically in the position he is more comfortable with. Unlike Digitaps (Azenkot, et al, 2013), ABTKA supports typing digits and alphabets. Another advantage is that ABTKA is considered faster than BrailleType, since the user can make one touch interaction with the required fingers at the same time in order to type.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main goal was to develop methods which are better suited for a particular person rather than a group. Azenkot, et al (2013) presented Digitaps, it is a number-entry method on touch screen devices developed for the visually impaired people; it supports audio feedback as an optional choice. Users who are willing to use Digitaps will have to learn a new typing technique which Figure 4.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BrailleTouch [26] allowed users to enter Braille characters using three fingers on each hand and offered a significant speed advantage over standard touchscreen braille keyboards. For the task of number entry, DigiTaps [3] encoded different gestures to the ten numeric digits. These gestures required a varying number of fingers to tap, swipe, or both.…”
Section: Software-based Touchscreen Assistive Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For people who use screen readers (e.g., VoiceOver for iOS, TalkBack for Android), finding and activating buttons in a spatial layout can be time consuming. Eyes-free solutions for accessible numeric input include Tapulator (gesture-based numeric input) [6], DigiTaps (minimal audio feedback for numeric input) [2], and BrailleTap (Braille-based gesture calculator) [1]. We demonstrate GestureCalc, an eyes-free target-less gesture-based touch screen calculator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%