Proceedings of the 21st International Academic Mindtrek Conference 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3131085.3131118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digitization for fun or reward?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Device trust is defined as “the degree to which individuals believe that they are confident in the quality and reliability of wearable devices” [ 39 ]. Although many studies have verified the accuracy and reliability of wearable devices from the perspective of precision medicine, there are relatively few studies on their technological acceptance [ 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Device trust is defined as “the degree to which individuals believe that they are confident in the quality and reliability of wearable devices” [ 39 ]. Although many studies have verified the accuracy and reliability of wearable devices from the perspective of precision medicine, there are relatively few studies on their technological acceptance [ 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[161] 534 0.770 [161] 534 0.352 [146] 274 0.580 [195] 156 0.180 [196] 129 0.454 [197] 313 0.386 [198] 600 0.690 [199] 210 0.370 [200] 519 0.691 [198] 436 0.320 [198] 436 0.340 [201] 927 0.280 [28] 227 0.380 [150] 164 0.504 [202] 273 0.80 [203] 225 0.750 [204] 196 0.125 [203] 225 0.3891 [147] 462 0.427 [147] 232 0.299 [147] 230 0.308 [205] 927 0.151 EE > BI [96] 195 0.020 [129] 318 −0.050 [33] 58 0.133 [27] 123 0.004 [27] 112 0.097 [90] 787 0.003 [152] 376 0.220 [206] 194 −0.050 [29] 256 0.004 [39] 406 0.281 [30] 325 0.206 [137] 185 0.140 [26] 660 0.194 [93] 217 0.145 [93] 109 0.072 [93] 108 0.169 [178] 263 0.126 [179] 311 0.150 [85] 296 −0.032 [148] 340 0.255 [181] 458 0.261 [131] 81 0.640 [182] 100 0.305 [183] 280 0.2...…”
Section: Relation Label N Original Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32] 392 0.130 [149] 324 0.235 [31] 927 0.300 [145] 146 0.235 [101] 280 0.258 [130] 130 0.040 [132] 386 0.510 [138] 363 −0.010 [77] 245 0.183 [138] 363 −0.111 [161] 534 0.126 [161] 534 0.230 [146] 274 0.131 [195] 156 0.174 [196] 129 −0.050 [201] 927 0.183 [150] 164 0.080 [203] 225 0.126 [203] 225 0.067 [203] 225 0.126 [205] 927 0.250 HM > BI [129] 318 −0.010 [33] 58 0.267 [98] 268 0.176 [29] 256 0.127 [30] 325 −0.030 [179] 311 0.065 [148] 340 0.410 [159] 322 0.107 [182] 100 0.239 [188] 410 0.098 [144] 271 0.420 [32] 392 0.071 [149] 324 0.111 [130] 130 0.015 [132] 386 0.050 [197] 313 −0.050 [150] 164 0.080 [204] 196 0.151 [203] 225 0.227 [202] 273 0.257 [203] 225 0.255 [147] 462 0.190 [147] 232 0.227 [147] 230 0.213 HB > BI …”
Section: Relation Label N Original Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Landolfi, 2016) Pleasing others not only starts a new economy of the self that is sold online through Instagram, TikTok and other channels, but also, in addition, activates the reward system or a gratification system that lights up in the brain and transmits hormones with the effect of a feeling of well-being in the subject. This system produces a circularity as users seek to repeat te experiences that give gratification and cause satisfaction through the reward system (Rajanen & Weng, 2017) and, of course, the digital platforms are oriented to allow it. On the Internet, the relationship is based on judgement: the dominance of the image and the creation of the self as a "brand" let possible the growth of a judgemental approach to others.…”
Section: Judgementmentioning
confidence: 99%