2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2107.02789
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digitized-counterdiabatic quantum approximate optimization algorithm

P. Chandarana,
N. N. Hegade,
K. Paul
et al.

Abstract: The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) has proved to be an effective classical-quantum algorithm serving multiple purposes, from solving combinatorial optimization problems to finding the ground state of many-body quantum systems. Since QAOA is an ansatz-dependent algorithm, there is always a need to design ansatz for better optimization. To this end, we propose a digitized version of QAOA enhanced via the use of shortcuts to adiabaticity. Specifically, we use a counterdiabatic (CD) driving term… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The execution time estimation also depends on the variant of QAOA. For example, counteradiabatic driving reduces p by adding counteradiabatic gates and an extra parameter at each layer [91,92] while Recursive-QAOA [61] will also produce different execution time estimates. However, the extra gates and different number of parameters to optimize may impact the execution time as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The execution time estimation also depends on the variant of QAOA. For example, counteradiabatic driving reduces p by adding counteradiabatic gates and an extra parameter at each layer [91,92] while Recursive-QAOA [61] will also produce different execution time estimates. However, the extra gates and different number of parameters to optimize may impact the execution time as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, many modifications have been reported in the standard QAOA [51][52][53]. Among them, the addition of terms using counterdiabatic (CD) driving has shown significant improvements in finding ground states of manybody Hamiltonians [29][30][31]. One of the algorithms following the same principle is the digitized-counterdiabatic quantum approximate optimization algorithm (DC-QAOA).…”
Section: Digitized-counterdiabatic Quantum Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Hegade et al showed the advantage of CD driving in DAdQC methods [24], which have shown interesting improvements in many-body ground state preparations and adiabatic quantum factorization problems [25]. It was also studied that the inclusion of these approximate counterdiabatic terms could enhance the performance of QAOA while solving combinatorial optimization problems and state preparation of many-body ground states [29][30][31]. This article considers the advantages of digitized-counterdiabatic quantum computing (DCQC) and digitized-counterdiabatic quantum approximate optimization algorithms (DC-QAOA) in financial applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there is a research indicates QAOA is at least counterdiabatic and has a better performance than finite time adiabatic evolution [4]. And there is also an effort to add a conterdiabatic term to the ansatz of QAOA to reduce the quantum circuit depth [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%