2019
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1650736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dignity during work-integrated learning: what does it mean for supervisors and students?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In simple words, decent work serves as a means by which WD is upheld or violated. Although a comprehensive review of how WD differs from other related constructs in management is beyond this study’s scope, it is noteworthy that WD is theoretically different from constructs, such as integrity, fairness, organizational justice, value, and equality (for a discussion, see Bal, 2017 ; King et al, 2021 ). Having explained WD and relevant theoretical foundations in detail, let us now turn the discussion to how this might affect employees’ JP (the central theme of this research).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In simple words, decent work serves as a means by which WD is upheld or violated. Although a comprehensive review of how WD differs from other related constructs in management is beyond this study’s scope, it is noteworthy that WD is theoretically different from constructs, such as integrity, fairness, organizational justice, value, and equality (for a discussion, see Bal, 2017 ; King et al, 2021 ). Having explained WD and relevant theoretical foundations in detail, let us now turn the discussion to how this might affect employees’ JP (the central theme of this research).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, while most research on WD is qualitative (e.g., Hodson and Roscigno, 2004 ; Sayer, 2007 ; Yalden and McCormack, 2010 ; Lucas, 2011 , 2015 ; Crowley, 2013 , 2014 ; Lucas et al, 2013 ; Baker and Lucas, 2017 ; Noronha et al, 2020 ; King et al, 2021 ; Tiwari et al, 2021 ), this study is a pioneering empirical work explaining and examining the link between WD and JP, thus expanding the scant body of empirical research investigating WD’s relationship with employee behaviors ( Thomas and Lucas, 2019 ; Ahmed et al, 2021 ; Wang et al, 2021 ). Second, this study furthers our understanding of the circumstances/conditions in which WD is more likely to enhance employees’ JP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there are many studies (Crowley, 2014; Baker and Lucas, 2017; Noronha et al. , 2020; King et al. , 2019; Tiwari et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IL and IWB literature have some notable gaps. Furthermore, there are many studies (Crowley, 2014;Baker and Lucas, 2017;Noronha et al, 2020;King et al, 2019;Tiwari et al, 2021) which explain work dignity as qualitative research. So, this current study has explained the empirical analysis to find the relationship among the workplace dignity (WD), inclusive leadership and IWB.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WIL students face even more wellbeing issues than other employees. Besides academic-related concerns about academic performance (Pascoe et al, 2020), WIL students tend to feel selfdoubt and lack of self-confidence at work, which are related to their underdeveloped professional dignity and can negatively impact their workplace wellbeing (King et al, 2021) .…”
Section: Wellbeing Literacy In the Workplacementioning
confidence: 99%