“…Indirect analytical approaches commonly involve: (1) the examination of ground deformation patterns (e.g., using InSAR, interferometric synthetic aperture radar) inferred to relate to the emplacement of magma (e.g., Pedersen, 2004;Wright et al, 2006;Pagli et al, 2012;Sparks et al, 2012); (2) scrutiny of petrological and geochemical data to assess magma contamination, residence times, crystallization histories, and melt source conditions (Cashman and Sparks, 2013, and references therein); and/or (3) mapping the location and crude geometry of crystallized intrusions or present-day zones of melt using geophysical techniques such as potential field, magnetotellurics, and seismicity (e.g., Cornwell et al, 2006;Whaler and Hautot, 2006;Desissa et al, 2013). For example, the application and synthesis of these techniques in the East African Rift system and Iceland have greatly improved our understanding of magma-tectonic interactions and allowed processes controlling continental break-up, such as dike intrusion, to be analyzed in real time (e.g., Ebinger et al, 2010;Gudmundsson et al, 2014;Sigmundsson et al, 2015). It is, however, important to consider that these data poorly constrain intrusion geometries and are commonly interpreted within the classical framework of igneous geology; i.e., magma migration within the Earth's crust is generally facilitated by the vertical intrusion of dikes, extending from a deep magma reservoir or melt source to overlying shallow-level intrusions and volcanoes ( Fig.…”