Dilemmas of medical overuse in general practice – A focus group study

Abstract

Objective: To obtain first-hand in-depth accounts of overtesting amongst GPs in Norway, as well as the GPs’ perspectives on drivers of overtesting and strategies that can prevent overtesting. Design and setting: Four focus groups with GPs were conducted. All participants were asked to share examples of unnecessary testing from their everyday general practice, to identify the driving forces involved in these examples and discuss any measures that might prevent excessive testing. All authors collaborated on the analysis, conducted as systematic text condensation, using critical incident technique. Results: This study reveals two main positions regarding overtesting in general practice. In the categorical position there is no such thing as overtesting and GPs are obliged to perform extensive investigations on the suspicion that any person can carry a fatal disease, no matter how minor or absent their symptoms are. In contrast, in the dilemmatic position, the GPs acknowledge that investigations can cause significant harm, but still feel pressured to discover disease at the earliest opportunity and to meet patients’ demands. The GPs’ strategies for resolving this dilemma are often demanding and not always successful, but sharing uncertainty and fallibility with patients and colleagues appears to be the most promising strategy. Conclusions: Our study indicates that GPs in Norway experience a strong pressure to discover any instance of disease and to meet patients’ demands for investigations. One way of preventing the harm that accrues from overtesting is openly sharing uncertainty and fallibility with patients and colleagues.

Our core values will endure

“…When taken together, the principles of Family Medicine represent a worldviewa system of values and approaches to problemsthat is identifiably different from that of other disciplines [2] During the following decades, societal trends have impacted both the context and the standards of care, that is, workload, tasks and organization within healthcare in general, and in General Practice in particular. Some of these trends have been described in this journal [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”

“…Furthermore, opportunistic ‘digital doctoring’ companies have emerged, alongside a growing interest among health authorities, investors, and researchers in monitoring consultations and analysing ‘Big Data’. Problems related to ‘too much medical overactivity’, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment are on the rise [ 10 , 11 ].…”

Doctors’ characteristics and the use of long consultations at out-of-hours services 2008–2017: a registry-based follow-up study in Norway

“…Since average length of consultations varies between different countries [7], the results presented here cannot directly be generalized to other countries. However, the trend towards longer consultations has also been demonstrated in other countries [6], and the expansion of defensive medicine is a general problem [14–18].…”

“…OOH work is often performed under difficult circumstances, with an increased risk of making errors [24]. Increasing medicolegal concerns and fear of complaints may cause doctors to behave more defensively in their practice [14–18]. Doctors order more tests, more imaging technology, refer more patients, prescribe more unnecessary drugs, and make more detailed notes for documenting that no errors have been committed.…”

A Nordic initiative for a more personal and accurate diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer

“…The first and crucial step is to decide whether or not to test. A Norwegian study indicates that GPs in Norway are experiencing strong pressure from patients to conduct examinations to detect illness [ 3 ]. While urological symptoms are common [ 4 ], their association to PCa is low [ 5 ].…”