2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2212.02890
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dilution of chemical enrichment in galaxies 600 Myr after the Big Bang

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
22
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing this metallicity to other strong-line diagnostics defined for local "analogs" of high-redshift galaxies (Bian et al 2018) yields offsets of −0.2, 0.4, and −0.3 dex for the R23, O32, and O3Hβ calibrations, respectively. The most accurate calibration for this particular galaxy seems to be the O32 calibration from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey reference sample in Bian et al (2018), similar to the O32 diagnostics derived by Curti et al (2020), which seems to be consistent with the direct metallicity within 0.1 dex (as is also evident from the galaxy at z = 9.5 presented by Heintz et al 2022b).…”
Section: Rest-frame Nebular Line Emission and Metallicitysupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparing this metallicity to other strong-line diagnostics defined for local "analogs" of high-redshift galaxies (Bian et al 2018) yields offsets of −0.2, 0.4, and −0.3 dex for the R23, O32, and O3Hβ calibrations, respectively. The most accurate calibration for this particular galaxy seems to be the O32 calibration from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey reference sample in Bian et al (2018), similar to the O32 diagnostics derived by Curti et al (2020), which seems to be consistent with the direct metallicity within 0.1 dex (as is also evident from the galaxy at z = 9.5 presented by Heintz et al 2022b).…”
Section: Rest-frame Nebular Line Emission and Metallicitysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Our SFR and M å measurements for instance predict 12 log + (O/H) = 7.76, about 0.6 dex higher than that derived from the strong-line diagnostics. This offset appears to be ubiquitous in high-z galaxies at z  5 (Heintz et al 2022b), likely indicating substantial infall of neutral, pristine gas diluting the metallicity at z  5. Intriguingly, S04590 shows a pair of mass and metallicity measurements similar to those of the local, extremely metal-poor galaxy I Zwicky 18 (I Zw 18), which is characterized by an oxygen abundance of .…”
Section: Rest-frame Nebular Line Emission and Metallicitymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on these calibrations, we find that the galaxies at z = 8 − 9 fall below the mass metallicity relations at z = 0 − 3 (e.g., Sanders et al 2021) extrapolated down to M star ∼ 10 7 M . This is generally consistent with the model predictions (e.g., Schaye et al 2015;Ma et al 2016;Pallottini et al 2022;Ucci et al 2023) and the recent JWST results of the mass-metallicity measurements at z = 5 − 9.5 (Matthee et al 2022a;Heintz et al 2022a), but with different calibrations (e.g., Bian et al 2018;Curti et al 2020). By applying the same R3 calibrations to these recent JWST results, we obtain 12 + log(O/H) 7.7 − 8.1 and 7.2 − 8.2 for the z = 5 − 7 field galaxies and the lensed galaxies at z = 7.5 − 9.5, respectively.…”
Section: Chemical Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Figure 5 presents the SFR-M star relation. For comparison, we show the main sequence estimated at z = 2 and z = 6 (Iyer et al 2018), recent JWST results for the sources spectroscopically confirmed at z = 7 − 13 (Tacchella et al 2022a;Williams et al 2022;Roberts-Borsani et al 2022;Heintz et al 2022a;Robertson et al 2022;Curtis-Lake et al 2022), recent HST+IRAC results for bright galaxies at z phot ∼ 8 − 9 (Tacchella et al 2022b), and the 16-84th percentile of the distribution of simulated galaxies at z = 7 − 8 (Yung et al 2019b(Yung et al , 2022Behroozi et al 2019Behroozi et al , 2020Nelson et al 2019;Wilkins et al 2022b,a). Note that we use the SED-based SFR estimate (Section 3.5), instead of using the Hβ line.…”
Section: Sfr Vs Mstarmentioning
confidence: 93%