Dimension analysis of subjective thermal comfort metrics based on ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database using machine learning

Abstract

We analyzed the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II to answer a fundamental but overlooked question in thermal comfort studies: how many and which subjective metrics should be used for the assessment of the occupants' thermal experience. We found that the thermal sensation is the most frequently used metrics in Thermal Comfort Database II, followed by thermal preference, comfort and acceptability. The thermal sensation/thermal preference, thermal comfort/air movement acceptability and thermal comfort/thermal preference are the top three most dependent metrics pairs. A principal component analysis confirmed that the personal experience of thermal conditions in built environment is not a one-dimensional problem, but at least a two-dimensional problem, and suggested thermal sensation and thermal comfort should be asked in right-now surveys as the first two Principal Component are majorly constructed by thermal sensation and thermal comfort. To further confirm the predictive power of thermal sensation and comfort, we used logistic regression and support vector machine to predict thermal acceptability and thermal preference with thermal sensation and comfort. The prediction accuracy is 87% for thermal acceptability and 64% for thermal preference. The prediction error might be due to occupants' individual difference and people errors in answering survey. These findings could help the design of chamber experiments, field studies, and human-building interaction interfaces by shedding light on the choice of subjective thermal metrics to effectively and accurately collect information on occupants' thermal experience.

Occupants’ Interaction With an Occupant Voting System for Thermal and Indoor Air Quality Feedback – Case Studies in Office Spaces

“…According to the questionnaires, about 80% of the occupants were satisfied with the thermal environment compared to the 60% expressed through votes on "Fine." This discrepancy was likely related to the scale design and the way occupants were asked to provide feedback (Schweiker et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020). Additionally, the discrepancy could also be related to the day-to-day uncertainty (Wang et al, 2018), e.g., illustrated in the large spread for each vote type per month in Figure 12B.…”

Sustainable Design Optimization Tool for Prototypical Buildings in Hot Arid Climate Using Analytical Hierarchy Process

“…Another limitation lies in the negligence of mechanical HVAC systems in all of the considered case studies, making the methodology more suited to naturally-ventilated buildings. As such, further work is suggested for similar cases, while including mechanical acclimatization systems and their associated properties in thermal [54,55]. Nevertheless, according to ASÉ (1989), Darula & Kittler (2002), CEN (2011) and Reinhart (2014), DF was primarily developed as a daylighting metric under overcast sky conditions, and is calculated for standard CIE overcast sky as well as 20 different CIE clear skies [49] [56-58].…”

Smart System for Thermal Comfort Prediction on Residential Buildings Using Data-Driven Model with Random Forest Classifier

“…They made use of support vector machine and logistic regression to anticipate warm admissibility and warm inclination with warm sensation and thermal comfort. The forecast accuracy is 87% for warm worthiness and 64% for warm inclination [16]. The architecture of the proposed system shows the processes involved in building a smart system for predicting thermal comfort in residential buildings.…”

“…Wang et al [16] applied machine learning methods on the information gathered in the recent released ASHRAE global thermal solace dataset in anticipating warm solace on private structures. They made use of support vector machine and logistic regression to anticipate warm admissibility and warm inclination with warm sensation and thermal comfort.…”