2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2013.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimension prints and the avoidance of sets for flow solutions of non-autonomous ordinary differential equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof By (14) and since I ⊂ R 0 , it suffices to check that F i (R 0 ) ⊂ R 0 for i = 1, 2. Indeed, from this it will follow that Fw(R 0 ) ⊂ R 0 for all non-empty finite words w ∈ {1, 2} * .…”
Section: The Dimension Of Sαmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof By (14) and since I ⊂ R 0 , it suffices to check that F i (R 0 ) ⊂ R 0 for i = 1, 2. Indeed, from this it will follow that Fw(R 0 ) ⊂ R 0 for all non-empty finite words w ∈ {1, 2} * .…”
Section: The Dimension Of Sαmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [14] using the notion of r-dimensional prints. [16], [17], and [13], in which such sufficient conditions for a flow to avoid a subset of [0, ∞) × R 3 are combined with partial regularity results for the Navier-Stokes equations to yield uniqueness of almost every trajectory for suitable weak solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since U is uniformly Lipschitz, its trajectory map X U is well defined and continuous, hence if we can show that X U (1, F 0 w (I)) = γF 0 w (I) for all w ∈ {1, 2} * then by (14)…”
Section: Contraction Of S α Due To Umentioning
confidence: 99%