2010
DOI: 10.1002/zamm.201000077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimension reduction for damping optimization in linear vibrating systems

Abstract: We consider a mathematical model of a linear vibrational system described by the second‐order differential equation , where M and K are positive definite matrices, called mass, and stiffness, respectively. We consider the case where the damping matrix D is positive semidefinite. The main problem considered in the paper is the construction of an efficient algorithm for calculating an optimal damping. As optimization criterion we use the minimization of the average total energy of the system which is equivale… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is obtained by modal analysis, linearization and applying a perfect shuffle permutation [2]. The rank of the initial perturbation U CV T is exactly the number of added viscous dampers.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is obtained by modal analysis, linearization and applying a perfect shuffle permutation [2]. The rank of the initial perturbation U CV T is exactly the number of added viscous dampers.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical experiments are carried out in MATLAB 8.3.0.532 (R2014a) on an Intel Core i5-2520M CPU @ 2.50GHz with 4 GB RAM. We consider two vibrational systems -a triple chain oscillator with dimensions n = 6002 and n = 9002, where a viscous damper is placed in the middle of the first chain [2] and an FEM model of a viscously damped beam with dimension n = 6000 and n = 8000 [3]. While in the left plot of Figure 1 the running times of the structure preserving sign function method w.r.t.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result has been generalized in [5] to the non-modal damping, obtaining the same set of optimal matrices. The results for the optimal damping without restrictions on the structure of damping matrices usually are not very useful in practical applications, but there is some recent progress in treating such problems (see [2,18,19]). …”
Section: The Corresponding Matrix Differential Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23]16,18,24]) which is constructed using appropriate linearization of system (1). Within this category, one can consider the following three criteria: minimization of the trace the solution of the corresponding Lyapunov equation, minimization of the 2-norm or the Frobenius norm of the solution of the corresponding Lyapunov equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%