1984
DOI: 10.1002/aja.1001690306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensional analysis and dynamic response characterization of mammalian peripheral vestibular structures

Abstract: Extensive morphometric measurements were made on the vestibular system of the rabbit ( Oryctulagus cuniculus), the gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus), the chinchilla (Chinchilla laniger ), and the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) from serial sections of temporal bones. Additionally, a more limited set of measurements were also completed on the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus), the Capuchin monkey (Cebus sp.), the harp seal ( Pagophilus groenlandicus Erxleben , 1777), and the two-toed sloth ( Choloepus sp.). The fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radius of curvature of the chinchilla semicircular canals have been previously determined to be 2.130 Ā± 0.168 mm for the anterior canal, 1.90 Ā± 0.015 for the horizontal canal, and 2.040 Ā± 0.306 mm for the posterior canal using histologic techniques (Ramprashad et al, 1984) These data agree well with the values reported here for the anterior and lateral canals, although the posterior canal radius reported here is somewhat smaller than previously described. The anterior canal is larger than the others in both studies, consistent with the relationship found in other species including pigeon (Landolt et al, 1975), bat (Ramprashad et al, 1980), guinea pig, squirrel and rhesus monkey (Blanks et al, 1985), and man (Curthoys et al, 1977).…”
Section: Shape Of Individual Canalssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The radius of curvature of the chinchilla semicircular canals have been previously determined to be 2.130 Ā± 0.168 mm for the anterior canal, 1.90 Ā± 0.015 for the horizontal canal, and 2.040 Ā± 0.306 mm for the posterior canal using histologic techniques (Ramprashad et al, 1984) These data agree well with the values reported here for the anterior and lateral canals, although the posterior canal radius reported here is somewhat smaller than previously described. The anterior canal is larger than the others in both studies, consistent with the relationship found in other species including pigeon (Landolt et al, 1975), bat (Ramprashad et al, 1980), guinea pig, squirrel and rhesus monkey (Blanks et al, 1985), and man (Curthoys et al, 1977).…”
Section: Shape Of Individual Canalssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Like the aVOR in all mammalian species examined so far (Ramprashad et al, 1984), mice exhibit a high-pass frequency response with respect to head rotational velocity, as shown in Figure 4. However, the mouse aVORā€™s performance at different frequencies relative to other species is interesting, because it supports the notion that differences in aVOR gain and frequency dependence across species depend on static visual acuity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Because the separation between different vestibular nerve branches in the rhesus labyrinth is āˆ¼1.5-1.7 times greater in rhesus than in chinchillas (Ramprashad et al 1984), we hypothesized that rhesus monkeys would exhibit findings at least as close to normal as those we have observed in chinchillas. Furthermore, even though elevated baseline stimulation with co-modulation and alignment precompensation strategies have both been shown to improve eye responses when employed separately, we sought to determine the eye response effects of simultaneously adapting the animal to elevated baseline stimulation and delivering comodulated stimuli with alignment precompensation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%