2008
DOI: 10.1002/gps.2130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensional approach to delusions in psychotic depression in the elderly: factor structure and clinical correlates

Abstract: Our results overlap in part with those of another similar study in delusional depressives of all age-ranges, differing, however, in respects possibly attributable to peculiarities of elderly depressives. Overall, the findings of the present study contribute to the further elucidation of major clinical dimensions of delusions in PMD in the elderly and the testing of their external validity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After post-hoc correction, no significant anamnestic or clinical determinant other than depressive severity resulted to impact over the emergence of dysfunctional beliefs. 13 , 25 , 30 , 31 ) Severity of depression has been proved to be associated with more severely distorted negative cognitions, which in turn may predict the emergence of psychotic symptoms, 13 ) however this multivariate analysis may hide the clinical univariate correlations, therefore we reported both.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…After post-hoc correction, no significant anamnestic or clinical determinant other than depressive severity resulted to impact over the emergence of dysfunctional beliefs. 13 , 25 , 30 , 31 ) Severity of depression has been proved to be associated with more severely distorted negative cognitions, which in turn may predict the emergence of psychotic symptoms, 13 ) however this multivariate analysis may hide the clinical univariate correlations, therefore we reported both.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Four of them were double‐blind randomized controlled studies and were rated as high‐quality studies (Meyers et al ., ; Mulsant et al ., ; Meyers et al ., ;Flint et al ., ), whereas 19 were open prospective controlled ones and were rated as medium‐quality studies (Kivela and Pahkala, ; Meyers et al ., ; Baldwin, ; Zubenko et al ., ; O'Brien et al ., ; Flint and Rifat, , ; Kim et al ., ; Simpson et al ., ; Meyers et al ., ; Gournellis et al ., ; Ohayon and Schatzberg, ; Lykouras et al ., ; Lee et al ., ; Parker et al ., ; Kessing, ; Kok et al ., ; Flint et al ., ; Gournellis et al ., ). Twelve were rated as low‐quality studies—always in regard to our research questions—because four were retrospective (Baldwin and Jolley, ; Meyers and Greenberg, ; Baldwin, ; Nelson et al ., ), three had a small number of PMD patients (Kunik et al ., , eight patients; Grierz et al ., , 10 patients; Politis et al ., , 11 patients), two (Murphy, ; Burvuil et al ., ) did not directly compare PMD and non‐PMD patients, one (Gournellis et al ., ) lacked a control group, one (Meyers et al ., ) did not compare older and younger PMD patients and one (Navaro et al ., ) had doubtful relevance to our research questions (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%