2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensional Comparison Theory: Paradoxical relations between self-beliefs and achievements in multiple domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
126
4
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
15
126
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, academic self-concept is subject-specific (Marsh et al, 2015;Valentine, DuBois, & Cooper, 2004); thus, in this study, we use the term math self-concept to refer to a collection of self-perceived beliefs and attitudes about one's own abilities and competences in math (Bong & Skaalvik, 2003;Chiu & Klassen, 2010;Marsh et al, 2015). Math self-concept has been shown to be positively related to children's achievement (Kikas & Mägi, 2017;Levpuscek & Zupancic, 2009;Valentine et al, 2004).…”
Section: Role Of Perceived Parental Involvement In Children's Math Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, academic self-concept is subject-specific (Marsh et al, 2015;Valentine, DuBois, & Cooper, 2004); thus, in this study, we use the term math self-concept to refer to a collection of self-perceived beliefs and attitudes about one's own abilities and competences in math (Bong & Skaalvik, 2003;Chiu & Klassen, 2010;Marsh et al, 2015). Math self-concept has been shown to be positively related to children's achievement (Kikas & Mägi, 2017;Levpuscek & Zupancic, 2009;Valentine et al, 2004).…”
Section: Role Of Perceived Parental Involvement In Children's Math Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A central assumption of the DCT is that dimensional comparison effects are moderated by the perceived similarity of the compared school subjects. According to the DCT, different school subjects form a similarity continuum (Marsh, Byrne, & Shavelson, 1988;Marsh, Lüdtke et al, 2015) that explains the different outcomes of dimensional comparisons. The DCT predicts that for dissimilar subjects (so-called far comparisons) like math and English, dimensional comparisons lead to contrast effects, whereas smaller contrast effects or even assimilation effects result between similar subjects (so-called near comparisons).…”
Section: The Dimensional Comparison Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recent extensions on the side of the predictors integrate more or other school subjects than merely the native language and math (e.g. Chiu, 2012;Marsh, Lüdtke et al, 2015;Jansen, Schroeders, Lüdtke & Marsh, 2015;Möller, Streblow, Pohlmann, & Köller, 2006;Nagy, Trautwein, Baumert, Köller, & Garrett, 2006), i.e., multiple academic subjects (native and foreign language, history, biology, physics, and math). As already outlined, the application of the I/E model to two similar subjects does not typically lead to contrast effects in subject-specific self-concepts.…”
Section: The Generalized Internal/external Frame Of Reference Model (mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model has been formed on the basis of these three models (Marsh & Köller, 2004;Marsh et al, 2015). The first steps towards the establishment of this model were made quite a while ago (Marsh, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%