Dimensional Structure of MAPS-15: Validation of the Multidimensional Academic Procrastination Scale

Abstract

Academic procrastination is a complex behavior that hampers the cyclical process of self-regulation in learning, impeding the flow of actions necessary to achieve the goals and sub-goals that students have set out to attain. It has a high frequency of occurrence and has been linked to lessened student performance and a decrease in psychological and physical well-being. The objective of this study is to analyze the psychometric characteristics of a new academic procrastination scale MAPS-15 (Multidimensional Academic Procrastination Scale) applicable in self-regulated learning environments through a cross-validation study (exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis). The sample consisted of 1289 students from a distance/online university, with a wide age range and sociocultural variability. The students completed self-reported online questionnaires on two dates: during the university access and adaptation phase and before the first period of compulsory exams. One-, two- and three-factor structures were tested as well as a second-order structure. The results support a three-dimensional structure of MAPS-15: core procrastination, a pure dimension of procrastinating behavior and difficulty in carrying out the action; poor time management, a dimension related to time organization and perceived control over time; and work disconnection, a dimension conceptually related to lack of persistence, and work interruptions.

Development and psychometric evaluation of nurses’ health-related procrastination scale

“…With 23 items and four factors (academic, workplace, medical and civic responsibilities related procrastination), The General Procrastination Scale had a predictive power of 31.25% for changes in procrastination [ 28 ]. The Multidimensional Academic Procrastination Scale with 15 items and three factors explained 53% of procrastination [ 29 ]. Furthermore, in a psychometric study of the Norwegian IPS, one factor could predict 39.35% of the changes in procrastination in a student sample from different universities and predict 44.72% of the changes in another student sample from one university [ 27 ].…”

Profiles of University Students Who Graduate on Time: A Cohort Study from the Chilean Context

“…In addition, a student's persistence and motivation, especially in the first year, are important [46]. Self-esteem, well-being, and commitment positively influence the student's academic performance [47,48], whereas academic procrastination reduces it [49].…”