2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.184502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensionality-induced BCS-BEC crossover in layered superconductors

Abstract: Based on a simple model of a layered superconductor with strong attractive interaction, we find that the separation of the pair-condensation temperature from the pair-formation temperature becomes more remarkable as the interlayer hopping gets smaller. We propose from this result the BCS-BEC crossover induced by the change in dimensionality, for instance, due to insertion of additional insulating layers or application of uniaxial pressure. The emergence of a pseudogap in the electronic density of states, which… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To explain physical meanings of the definitions of T * and T c , it is convenient to consider the opposite limit to the weak-coupling BCS one in which T * and T c take almost the same value. In this strong-coupling limit (U/t → ∞), we can show that T * ∝ |µ| ∝ U ∝ E b , where E b is the two-particle binding energy [25]; therefore, T * can be interpreted as the pair-formation (or pairbreaking) temperature. Actually, regardless of the interaction strength U , T * is of the same order of magnitude as the zero-temperature excitation energy gap E gap , which can be interpreted as a typical energy scale to break an electron pair (see Appendix A); thus, T * can be interpreted as the pair-formation temperature.…”
Section: Zero-field Pair-formation and Pair-condensation Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To explain physical meanings of the definitions of T * and T c , it is convenient to consider the opposite limit to the weak-coupling BCS one in which T * and T c take almost the same value. In this strong-coupling limit (U/t → ∞), we can show that T * ∝ |µ| ∝ U ∝ E b , where E b is the two-particle binding energy [25]; therefore, T * can be interpreted as the pair-formation (or pairbreaking) temperature. Actually, regardless of the interaction strength U , T * is of the same order of magnitude as the zero-temperature excitation energy gap E gap , which can be interpreted as a typical energy scale to break an electron pair (see Appendix A); thus, T * can be interpreted as the pair-formation temperature.…”
Section: Zero-field Pair-formation and Pair-condensation Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…V, U = 2.57t (green dotted line) and 5.14t (yellow dotted line), are also shown. also show with a grey dotted line the threshold value U = U 0 8.14t for the formation of a two-particle bound state [21,25,26]. Note that the BCS-BEC crossover occurs close to U 0 .…”
Section: Zero-field Pair-formation and Pair-condensation Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where p and q correspond to the momentum of impurity and hole respectively, ω and Ω correspond to the frequency of impurity and hole respectively. For pairing mechanism, this expression is definitely important, e.g., for the pairing instability [57,37,58,59] and the resonantly enhanced correlation, and its real part and imaginary part are easy to obtained by firstly replacing the imaginary frequencies in denominator with the analytical continuation and then using the Dirac identity (for retarded functions) lim η→0…”
Section: Pair Propagator and Relaxation Time At Finite Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the interspecies interaction changes to zero, the full polarization becomes simply the overlap of the impurity and majority particle, and we can expect that the polarization has two distinct peaks in such case, contributed by the two components respectively. Further, when consider the perturbation effect, the Hartree term with bare attractive interaction should be contained in the self-energy [51].…”
Section: Coulomb Interaction and Induced Self-energymentioning
confidence: 99%