1966
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1966.tb01334.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensionality of the Semantic Space for Communication via Facial Expressions

Abstract: Facial expressions were posed by student actors and labeled by student judges, the judges being restricted to the same labels as were given to the actors. Factor analyses yielded evidence for three major dimensions resembling those proposed by Schlosberg (1954): Pleasantness, Activation, and Control. A hypothetical emotional‐expression solid, a pyramid truncated at the far end (passive direction), is proposed as a resolution of recent controversies over the number and nature of dimensions. Cluster analyses con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
159
0
5

Year Published

1970
1970
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
13
159
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This function can nevertheless be interpreted as attention orientation as represented in the action readiness mode attending, defined by Frijda as wanting to observe well, to understand, to pay attention (Frijda, 1986;Frijda et al, 1989). This function also corresponds to Osgood's Interest factor (Osgood, 1966), which has subsequently been reported in studies on facial expression and labeled as attentional activity (Smith & Ellsworth, 1985). Last, we assessed how well the behavioral model based on our body movement coding is able to predict individual emotions.…”
Section: Emotion Differentiation: Discriminant Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This function can nevertheless be interpreted as attention orientation as represented in the action readiness mode attending, defined by Frijda as wanting to observe well, to understand, to pay attention (Frijda, 1986;Frijda et al, 1989). This function also corresponds to Osgood's Interest factor (Osgood, 1966), which has subsequently been reported in studies on facial expression and labeled as attentional activity (Smith & Ellsworth, 1985). Last, we assessed how well the behavioral model based on our body movement coding is able to predict individual emotions.…”
Section: Emotion Differentiation: Discriminant Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimensional models (Osgood, 1966;Russell, 1983;Schlosberg, 1952, Schlosberg, 1954 imply that emotions can be defined by their locations on a small number of emotion dimensions (usually two or three). The circumplex model (Russell, 1980, Russell, 2003, for example, states that all possible affective experiences can be represented along a circular structure that is anchored by two independent and bipolar axes, valence or pleasantness, and arousal or activation.…”
Section: Emotion Theories and Predictions On Bodily Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three dimensions are commonly found (Bimler & Kirkland, 1997;Frijda, 1969;Lemay, Kirouack, & Lacouture, 1995;Osgood, 1966;Paramei, 1996;Royal & Hays, 1959). Since Schlosberg (1954), there has been consensus about one major dimension-variously described as "Valence," "Positive / Negative," or "Hedonic Tone"-separating expressions of happiness from those of sadness, anger, etc.…”
Section: Geometrical Models For Representing the Affective Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have extended this model to emotional memory for images, facial expressions, language, and experiences (Bradley, Codispoti, Cuthbert, & Lang, 2001;Osgood, 1966;Robinson, 1980;Russell, 1980). The interaction of these dimensions on memory accuracy, persistence, or quality have been addressed, but rarely in combination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%