Abstract. Online analysis with mass spectrometers produces complex data sets, consisting of mass spectra with a large number of chemical compounds (ions). Statistical dimension reduction techniques (SDRTs) are able to condense complex data sets into a more compact form while preserving the information included in the original observations. The general principle of these techniques is to investigate the underlying dependencies of the measured variables, by combining variables with similar characteristics to distinct groups, called factors or components. Currently, positive matrix factorization (PMF) is the most commonly exploited SDRT across a range of atmospheric studies, in particular for source apportionment. In this study, we used 5 different SDRTs in analysing mass spectral data from complex gas- and particle phase measurements during laboratory experiment investigating the interactions of gasoline car exhaust and α-pinene. Specifically, we used four factor analysis techniques: principal component analysis (PCA), positive matrix factorization (PMF), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), as well as one clustering technique, partitioning around medoids (PAM). All SDRTs were able to resolve 4–5 factors from the gas phase measurements, including an α-pinene precursor factor, 2–3 oxidation product factors and a background/car exhaust precursor factor. NMF and PMF provided an additional oxidation product factor, which was not found by other SDRTs. The results from EFA and PCA were similar after applying oblique rotations. For the particle phase measurements, four factors were discovered with NMF and PMF: one primary factor, a mixed LVOOA factor, and two α-pinene SOA derived factors. PAM was not able to resolve interpretable clusters due to general limitations of clustering methods, as the high degree of fragmentation taking place in the AMS causes different compounds formed at different stages in the experiment to be detected at the same variable. However, when preliminary analysis is needed, or isomers and mixed sources are not expected, cluster analysis may be a useful tool as the results are simpler and thus easier to interpret. In the factor analysis techniques, any single ion generally contributes to multiple factors, although EFA and PCA try to minimize this spread. Our analysis shows that different SDRTs put emphasis on different parts of the data, and with only one technique some interesting data properties may still stay undiscovered. Thus, validation of the acquired results either by comparing between different SDRTs or applying one technique multiple times (e.g. by resampling the data or giving different starting values for iterative algorithms) is important as it may protect the user from dismissing unexpected results as unphysical.