2010
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbq149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensions of Executive Functioning in Schizophrenia and Their Relationship With Processing Speed

Abstract: Context:The nature of executive dysfunction in schizophrenia is nebulous, due to inconsistencies in conceptualizing and operationalizing the construct, and the broader question of whether schizophrenia is best characterized in terms of specific vs generalized cognitive deficits. The current study aimed to determine whether executive functions represent unitary vs diverse constructs in schizophrenia. Methods: Participants included 145 community-dwelling individuals with schizophrenia. Executive functions were m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, recent findings from our research group based on an independent sample (Savla, Twamley, Delis, et al, 2010; Savla, Twamley, Thompson, et al, 2010) suggest that the mental flexibility and abstraction components of executive function may be at least partially independent, and that severity of deficits on some mental flexibility tasks may be more common than among others. Those findings were based on a large battery of executive function tests designed to permit distinguishing different aspects of executive function, whereas the present battery did not include sufficient numbers of tests of each type of executive function to examine those two types separately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, recent findings from our research group based on an independent sample (Savla, Twamley, Delis, et al, 2010; Savla, Twamley, Thompson, et al, 2010) suggest that the mental flexibility and abstraction components of executive function may be at least partially independent, and that severity of deficits on some mental flexibility tasks may be more common than among others. Those findings were based on a large battery of executive function tests designed to permit distinguishing different aspects of executive function, whereas the present battery did not include sufficient numbers of tests of each type of executive function to examine those two types separately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our research group has previously reported factor analyses of a larger neurocognitive battery in schizophrenia (Gladsjo et al, 2004), as well as a more recent study focused on the factor structure of a large battery of tests specifically within the domain of executive functions (Savla, Twamley, Delis, et al, 2010). However, those studies were focused on identifying meaningful groupings of cognitive tests; the present study (based on a sample independent from the other studies) is focused on identifying cognitive groupings patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Everyday functional skills were evaluated with the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment, (UPSA; Patterson et al, 2001), which assesses capacity to perform tasks necessary for independent living, related to finances, communication, recreation planning, transportation, and household chores. Neurocognitive assessments included the American National Adult Reading Test (ANART; Grober and Sliwinski, 1991), an oral reading test measuring crystallized verbal knowledge and therefore used as an estimate of premorbid IQ; the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R; Benedict, 1997) and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R; Brandt and Benedict, 2001) Delis et al, 2001), a nine-subtest battery assessing multiple aspects of executive functioning that load on two factors, cognitive flexibility and abstraction (Savla et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this interpretation only holds true if those cognitive processes, which are required to complete the digit-symbol substitution task, are truly synonymous with processing-speed ability. Indeed evidence is now accruing which suggests that perhaps digit-symbol substitution performance is reliant on more complex cognitive abilities such as memory and executive function (5-9). Were this the case it would necessitate a re-evaluation of the meaning of the digit-symbol substitution impairment in schizophrenia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%