1988
DOI: 10.21236/ada194951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensions of Job Performance

Abstract: TN 88-39 lb RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS 3 DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY OF REPORT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 5. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUM8£R(S) 6a NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Kevin Murphy 6b OFFICE SYMBOL (If appUcibIt) 7a. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION Navy Personnel Research and Development Center '6c ADDRESS (Ofy, Start, and 2lf> Code)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
109
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
109
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The communication whether it may be oral or written shows the expertise and reflects an important factor of job performance. Murphy and Kroeker (1988) explains the job performance as a set of four dimensions: task job performance, interpersonal, down-time behavior, and destructive behaviors. Task job performance means doing role-prescribed actions; and interpersonal behavior means assisting co-workers, joint team effort, and pro-social attitude.…”
Section: Job Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The communication whether it may be oral or written shows the expertise and reflects an important factor of job performance. Murphy and Kroeker (1988) explains the job performance as a set of four dimensions: task job performance, interpersonal, down-time behavior, and destructive behaviors. Task job performance means doing role-prescribed actions; and interpersonal behavior means assisting co-workers, joint team effort, and pro-social attitude.…”
Section: Job Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only are these dependent variables highly relevant to organisations, they also represent two different processes. The enactment of OCB is an energising and activating process, in which employees enact discretionary efforts that promote the effectiveness of the organisation (Borman andMotowidlo, 1997, Organ, 1997), whereas exhibiting an intention to turnover is characterised as a withdrawal process (Murphy, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some of scholars think that performance is a kind of behavior rather than a result (Campbell, McCloy, Oppler, 1993) [37]. These behaviors were related to the goals of organization or the department or team which the employee is in (Murphy, 1989) [38]. In fact, performance has both positive and negative effects on production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%