2021
DOI: 10.1002/arco.5226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dingoes and domestication

Abstract: Aboriginal Australians are known to have routinely taken dingo pups from wild dens to rear as companion animals, with the mature canids typically returning to the bush to mate. Available accounts emphasise the strong emotional bonds between Indigenous people and “camp dingoes”, which were essentially raised as though they were human. Yet despite the closeness of human–canine relations in Australia, it is widely contended that Aboriginal people did not domesticate dingoes. The accepted thinking is that while th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 87 ] (p. 94)). A plethora of papers on human–dingo interactions and dingo behaviour generally also appeared in the anthropological literature in the 1970s (for summaries, see [ 5 , 21 ]). There was no explicit mention in any these studies of dingoes attacking humans.…”
Section: Results: Earlier Cultural Attitudes Towards Dingoesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 87 ] (p. 94)). A plethora of papers on human–dingo interactions and dingo behaviour generally also appeared in the anthropological literature in the 1970s (for summaries, see [ 5 , 21 ]). There was no explicit mention in any these studies of dingoes attacking humans.…”
Section: Results: Earlier Cultural Attitudes Towards Dingoesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is beyond the remit of the current study. Historical accounts suggest that during the period of early European settlement Indigenous peoples in Australia had a complex relationship with dingoes that was based on taking pre-weaned pups from wild dens and hand-rearing them for temporary adoption as ‘pets’ [ 5 , 20 , 21 ]. A separate study is required to examine this human-canid relationship in detail, such that any evidence for dingoes attacking Aboriginal people can be fully contextualised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although carefully provisioned and doted on in their puppyhood, these dingoes were weaned off close human caretaking as they aged into adolescence. With little nutrition freely available in the camp, and a strong urge to disperse and reproduce, tame dingoes departed human society soon after becoming sexually mature, dispersing back into the Bush in order to live and breed independently in the wild [ 15 ]; although it is possible that in some times and places there were individuals that either did not stray far from the camps or indeed essentially remained within them throughout their lives [ 32 , 33 , 34 ]. This section outlines the ways in which Aboriginal people managed tame dingoes, with particular attention to their efforts to socialise them to domestic life and thus produce acceptable behavioural dispositions.…”
Section: Rearing and Socialisation Of Camp Dingoes By Aboriginal Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broad consensus among present-day scholars is that despite the close relationship between Aboriginal people and dingoes the latter were generally free-roaming canids that lived independently of humans [ 3 , 15 , 30 , 31 ]. While some aspects of this standard story can be questioned [ 32 , 33 , 34 ], it does seem evident that where the Aboriginal–dingo relationship was documented it was based on the capture and (temporary) adoption of wild-born pups [ 15 ]. Apart from these aspects, much remains unknown about the nature of the earlier human–dingo relationship [ 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation