1994
DOI: 10.1042/bst022332s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dinitrogenase reductase ADP-ribosyl transferase and dinitrogenase reductase activating glycohydrolase in Gloeothece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, there have been increasing efforts directed toward generating proteome-wide maps of PPIs . The most commonly used high-throughput methods for the study of protein complexes are yeast-two-hybrid (Y2H) screens , or affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS). The Y2H screens are expensive, time consuming, and incomplete . The N- or C-terminal tagging in the AP-MS method can affect the expression and interaction of endogenous proteins, , and the application of an AP-MS method is also limited by the availability of tagged constructs or antibodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, there have been increasing efforts directed toward generating proteome-wide maps of PPIs . The most commonly used high-throughput methods for the study of protein complexes are yeast-two-hybrid (Y2H) screens , or affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS). The Y2H screens are expensive, time consuming, and incomplete . The N- or C-terminal tagging in the AP-MS method can affect the expression and interaction of endogenous proteins, , and the application of an AP-MS method is also limited by the availability of tagged constructs or antibodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22−24 The Y2H screens are expensive, time consuming, and incomplete. 25 The N-or C-terminal tagging in the AP-MS method can affect the expression and interaction of endogenous proteins, 24,26 and the application of an AP-MS method is also limited by the availability of tagged constructs or antibodies.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two forms of the Feprotein that CM be detected in extracts of R rubrum behave very similarly during SDSPAGE to the Fe-protein in extracts of Attempts to demonstrate ADP-nbosylabon of the Fe-protein in Gloeothece have proved unsuccessful For example, incubabon of Gloeothece w~th NaH,'2P04 for 6 h or w~th [8-l4CC] adenine for 24 h faded to generate any radioactwe Fe-protein In addibon, anfibodes rased agrunst ADP-ribose d d not react wth Fe-protein from Gloeothece, though they d d react w~th Fe-protein from R rubrum (J Cheng, H Hilz & J R Gallon, unpublished findings) On the other hand, Gloeothece contam proteins that react wth mfisera rased agmnst the enzymes that catalyse the reversible ADP-nbosylabon of the Fe-protein of R rubrum nitrogenase [6] However, there is no evldence that these Gloeothece proteins catalyse any ADP-nbosylabon reacbon Moreover, even if they do, their substrate is not, apparently, the Fe-protein of nitrogenase…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%