2013
DOI: 10.1292/jvms.13-0179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dioxin Sensitivity-Related Two Critical Amino Acids of Arylhydrocarbon Receptor May Not Correlate with the Taxonomy or Phylogeny in Avian Species

Abstract: There are two arylhydrocarbon receptor (AhR) isoforms in birds, AhR1 and AhR2. The varying sensitivity of AhR is reported to be related to two critical amino acids at positions 325 and 381 in the AhR1 ligand-binding domain. In this study, seven avian species whose in vivo dioxin sensitivity was known, and 13 species with no data regarding their in vivo dioxin sensitivity were examined. The two critical amino acids in the ligand-binding domain were investigated in avian species, and the results were compared wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional toxicological testing and risk assessment methods assume that related species share similar xenobiotic sensitivities and extrapolate toxicity data from one species to another based on phylogenetic relatedness 43 . Our results lend support to a growing body of evidence that this is likely an imprecise practice for DLCs, given that AHR1 LBD subtypes, which are strong predictors of avian DLC sensitivity 10 , 11 , 13 , do not correspond well with avian phylogeny 9 , 16 . Our study illustrates the value of trait-based approaches to better understand the evolution of factors that affect species sensitivity with application for conservation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional toxicological testing and risk assessment methods assume that related species share similar xenobiotic sensitivities and extrapolate toxicity data from one species to another based on phylogenetic relatedness 43 . Our results lend support to a growing body of evidence that this is likely an imprecise practice for DLCs, given that AHR1 LBD subtypes, which are strong predictors of avian DLC sensitivity 10 , 11 , 13 , do not correspond well with avian phylogeny 9 , 16 . Our study illustrates the value of trait-based approaches to better understand the evolution of factors that affect species sensitivity with application for conservation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Remarkably, there appears to be little correspondence between the three AHR1 LBD types and phylogeny, particularly for the high sensitivity type 1 group 9,16 . Hwang et al 9 showed that the transactivation potential of a naturally-occurring dioxin was in the order of type 1 > type 2 > type 3 and demonstrated that factors related to the exposure of birds to naturally occurring dioxins, including a species' habitat and diet, may have contributed to the natural selection of the three AHR1 LBD types in avian species during their evolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An earlier study demonstrated that the genotype distribution of key amino acids, corresponding to the 324th and 380th amino acid positions of ck AHR1, in avian AHR isoforms could not be predicted from the phylogenetic tree or previously constructed taxonomy 35 . On the other hand, when we investigated the genotype distribution using our larger data set of 113 avian species, certain AHR1 genotypes were dominant in the Neoaves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, carnivorous birds or those living in wet habitats tend to possess fewer sensitive aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AhR), which regulate the expression of genes encoding xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes (e.g., UGT1s and CYP1s). Avian AhRs are divided into three genetic types: highly sensitive (Ile-324 and Ser-380), moderately sensitive (Ile-324 and Ala-380), and less sensitive to dioxin (Val-324 and Ala-380) [ 36 , 37 ]. Certain species may have more of the third genetic type because they receive elevated levels of naturally occurring dioxins through the food web in specific habitats or under specific diets [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%