2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dip coating of charged colloidal suspensions onto substrates with patterned wettability: Coating regime maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 12.8 shows this accumulation of particles during the second evaporation stage. This was also observed in previous publications for the system silica particles and silicon wafer, when the attraction between particles and substrate was weakened by electrostatics (Reynolds et al, 2010). Particles were distributed fairly homogeneously in the drop, and only a few particles accumulated close to the contact line due to the internal flow caused by the enhanced evaporation flux at the contact line, as described by Deegan et al (1997).…”
Section: Soft Substrates 163supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Figure 12.8 shows this accumulation of particles during the second evaporation stage. This was also observed in previous publications for the system silica particles and silicon wafer, when the attraction between particles and substrate was weakened by electrostatics (Reynolds et al, 2010). Particles were distributed fairly homogeneously in the drop, and only a few particles accumulated close to the contact line due to the internal flow caused by the enhanced evaporation flux at the contact line, as described by Deegan et al (1997).…”
Section: Soft Substrates 163supporting
confidence: 84%
“…This was also observed for the system silica particles and silicon wafer, when the attraction between particles and the substrate was weakened by electrostatic charges. 38 In contrast, for so substrates, particles or agglomerates of particles were deposited during contact line retraction. We suggest that two parameters were responsible for the deposition of the particles on the soer substrate: the contact angle of the droplet and the contact line velocity.…”
Section: Deposition Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details from the manufacturer reveal that the dispersion is composed of 20 nm individual particles in open clusters with a median aggregate diameter of 150 nm. The dispersion shear thins slightly, with an average viscosity of $5 mPa s as reported in experimental measurements elsewhere [41]. The solvent evaporates after coating and the dried films are imaged with an optical microscope.…”
Section: Wire-wound Rod Coatingmentioning
confidence: 85%