2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-004-2392-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diphenolases from Anoxybacillus kestanbolensis strains K1 and K4 T

Abstract: Diphenolases from Anoxybacillus kestanbolensis strains K1 and K4 T , highly active against 4-methylcatechol were characterized in terms of pH-and temperature-optima, pH-and temperature-stability, kinetic parameters, and inhibition/activation behaviour towards some general polyphenol oxidase (PPO) inhibitors and metal ions. The temperature-activity optima, for Anoxybacillus kestanbolensis K1 and K4 T catecholases in the presence of 4-methylcatechol, were 80 and 70°C, respectively. Although catecholase from A. k… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The residual activity was determined in standard conditions using PNPA as substrate. The percentage residual esterase activity was calculated by comparison with unincubated enzyme at the optimum conditions (Yildirim et al. 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residual activity was determined in standard conditions using PNPA as substrate. The percentage residual esterase activity was calculated by comparison with unincubated enzyme at the optimum conditions (Yildirim et al. 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After reaching to room temperature, the esterase activity was determined at standard assay conditions. Control with non-incubated enzyme was used to determine the 100% activity value [28].…”
Section: Ph-and Thermal-stability Of the Enzymementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the storage period, the esterase activity was assayed under standard reaction conditions. The percentage residual enzyme activity was calculated by comparison with nonincubated enzyme (Yildirim et al . 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%