2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.99.053005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dipion light-cone distribution amplitudes and Bππ form factors

Abstract: We suggest to update the expansion coefficients of 2πDAs with the distribution amplitudes of light mesons evaluated from lattice QCD, with which we revisit B 0 → π + π 0 transition form factors from light-cone sum rules approach and extend the predictions from the threshold of dipion invariant mass to high energies with including the resonance intervals. We also derive B − → π 0 π 0 transition form factors with the isoscalar dipion final state, serving as the supplement to the isovector ones to complete the se… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is easy to see the overwhelming role of f 0 , while the contributions from f 0 and f 0 account only ∼ 5%. The result at the full recoiled energy q 2 F (l=0) t (1, 0)/m B s = 54.0 +4.0 −7.0 is much larger than the result for S−wave B → ππ form factors obtained in the LCSRs with 2π DAs [98][99][100], with the asymptotic prediction q 2 F (l=0) t,asy (4m 2 π , 0)/m B = 5.40 ± 1.00, this discrepancy is explained by the strong threshold effect of f 0 in thē B s → K K decay.…”
Section: Numericscontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…It is easy to see the overwhelming role of f 0 , while the contributions from f 0 and f 0 account only ∼ 5%. The result at the full recoiled energy q 2 F (l=0) t (1, 0)/m B s = 54.0 +4.0 −7.0 is much larger than the result for S−wave B → ππ form factors obtained in the LCSRs with 2π DAs [98][99][100], with the asymptotic prediction q 2 F (l=0) t,asy (4m 2 π , 0)/m B = 5.40 ± 1.00, this discrepancy is explained by the strong threshold effect of f 0 in thē B s → K K decay.…”
Section: Numericscontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…In the literature, similar B → ππ form factors in B → πππ decays have been studied extensively [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. In the kinematic regime where the dipion state has a large energy and a low invariant mass,B 0 → π þ π 0 form factors have been studied using QCD light-cone sum rules with B-meson distribution amplitudes [28][29][30]. The interference of ρð770Þ with the excited ρ resonances such as ρð1450Þ and ρð1750Þ are regarded as effective "nonresonant" contributions.…”
Section: B Nonresonant Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, nonperturbative wave functions include two-meson light-cone distributions, which contain both resonant and nonresoant contributions. For instance, the measurement of by LHCb [5] indicates that the resonances , of the S-wave -pair are dominant, which is confirmed by the theoretical calculation in the framework of PQCD [42][43][44][45][46][47]. In this work, we focus on and include the contributions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%