2018
DOI: 10.1101/267229
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

diploS/HIC: an updated approach to classifying selective sweeps

Abstract: Identifying selective sweeps in populations that have complex demographic histories remains a difficult problem in population genetics. We previously introduced a supervised machine learning approach, S/HIC, for finding both hard and soft selective sweeps in genomes on the basis of patterns of genetic variation surrounding a window of the genome. While S/HIC was shown to be both powerful and precise, the utility of S/HIC was limited by the use of phased genomic data as input. In this report we describe a deep … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
87
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As presented in the Introduction, bottlenecks can mimic signals of selection as they also lead to the fixation of long haplotypes. To alleviate this issue, we applied diploS/HIC, a recently developed machine‐learning approach to detect selective sweeps and classify them as hard or soft (Schrider and Kern, ; Kern and Schrider, ) while integrating the demographic history of the eastern and western population previously inferred by Stritt et al . ().…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As presented in the Introduction, bottlenecks can mimic signals of selection as they also lead to the fixation of long haplotypes. To alleviate this issue, we applied diploS/HIC, a recently developed machine‐learning approach to detect selective sweeps and classify them as hard or soft (Schrider and Kern, ; Kern and Schrider, ) while integrating the demographic history of the eastern and western population previously inferred by Stritt et al . ().…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(). One of the major advantages of diploS/HIC is that the algorithm is robust to demographic model misspecification (Kern and Schrider, ). By providing a confusion matrix, it also estimates false positive and false negative rates and allows a better assessment of the confidence levels expected under different scenarios of selection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used diploS/HIC (Kern & Schrider, ), a recently developed machine‐learning algorithm, to classify genomic windows as selected or not in northern clades. Simulated data sets are split into subwindows that are described by a set of 12 summary statistics (Kern & Schrider, ) recapitulating the allele frequency spectrum or linkage disequilibrium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used diploS/HIC (Kern & Schrider, ), a recently developed machine‐learning algorithm, to classify genomic windows as selected or not in northern clades. Simulated data sets are split into subwindows that are described by a set of 12 summary statistics (Kern & Schrider, ) recapitulating the allele frequency spectrum or linkage disequilibrium. In the case of selection, simulated windows where the selected site lies in the central subwindows are considered hard or soft sweep examples, while other windows are considered linked‐hard or linked‐soft examples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation