2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3982515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dipnet: Driver Intention Prediction for a Safe Takeover Transition in Automated Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter case it is the most vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists that are most likely to be placed at risk by AVs with no “theory of road users.” Table 1 presents a categorization of some of the judgments that humans may make about other road users and the features or behaviors that may support those judgment, with that caveat that those assumptions may sometimes be erroneous. There have been neural network systems developed that attempt to predict driver behavior or intent, but a number of these are using vehicle kinematics to estimate trajectories ( Bonyani et al, 2015 ; Girma et al, 2020 ), but not yet attempting the broader process of detecting potential behavior of pedestrians and cyclists, which remains a significant challenge ( Gilpin, 2021 ). What would be valuable would be the identification of the most reliable dynamic features of road user behavior that can lead to computational models arriving at robust estimates of emergent behavior (e.g., Markkula et al (2023) ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case it is the most vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists that are most likely to be placed at risk by AVs with no “theory of road users.” Table 1 presents a categorization of some of the judgments that humans may make about other road users and the features or behaviors that may support those judgment, with that caveat that those assumptions may sometimes be erroneous. There have been neural network systems developed that attempt to predict driver behavior or intent, but a number of these are using vehicle kinematics to estimate trajectories ( Bonyani et al, 2015 ; Girma et al, 2020 ), but not yet attempting the broader process of detecting potential behavior of pedestrians and cyclists, which remains a significant challenge ( Gilpin, 2021 ). What would be valuable would be the identification of the most reliable dynamic features of road user behavior that can lead to computational models arriving at robust estimates of emergent behavior (e.g., Markkula et al (2023) ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a report by the World Health Organization (WHO), fatal injuries resulting from road traffic accidents account for approximately 1.35 million deaths worldwide annually, with non-fatal incidents excluded [1]. Driver misconduct, which includes dangerous driving behaviors such as illegal lane changes or turns, speeding, and fatigue driving, has been found to be the primary cause of most traffic accidents according to research in the field of road safety [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) have been widely valued as a means to improve driving safety and prevent car accidents. Driver intention prediction, a key component of such systems, enables drivers to rapidly detect potential hazards and develop a range of solutions to enhance road safety [1,3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations