1990
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.65.1064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dipolar ferromagnetic order in a cubic system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the fcc case, the M-H loop for the sc lattice has a shallower slope of the magnetization's field dependence and a larger field is required to reach saturation. These differences are an indication of the tendency towards ferromagnetic order between dipoles on a fcc lattice (without boundaries) [3][4][5] in contrast to the sc lattice which tends toward antiferromagnetic order. Indeed, the results of this finite-size simulation show a remanent spin configuration that is similar to the 90 0 domain structure expected of a ferromagnetic cube in the fcc case.…”
Section: Zero Temperature Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the fcc case, the M-H loop for the sc lattice has a shallower slope of the magnetization's field dependence and a larger field is required to reach saturation. These differences are an indication of the tendency towards ferromagnetic order between dipoles on a fcc lattice (without boundaries) [3][4][5] in contrast to the sc lattice which tends toward antiferromagnetic order. Indeed, the results of this finite-size simulation show a remanent spin configuration that is similar to the 90 0 domain structure expected of a ferromagnetic cube in the fcc case.…”
Section: Zero Temperature Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a case, an understanding of ObD at T = 0 + can not be leveraged to explain the selection at T c . Examples include the transition to long-range order in the pyrochlore Heisenberg antiferromagnet with indirect DM interactions [50,65,66], the problem of magnetization direction selection in face-centered cubic dipolar ferromagnets [67,68] and the topical issue of state selection in XY pyrochlore antiferromagnets [45,49,64,[69][70][71][72][73]. …”
Section: A) B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dipolar ferromagnetism is distinguished from the common ferromagnetic order due to exchange interactions. Experimental evidence for this state was first obtained in rare-earth salts, with a dipolar Curie temperature T c,dip of ϳ0.1 K. 2 Later calculations 3,4 suggested the feasibility of the dipolar ferromagnetic state at higher temperatures for dense assemblies of monodomain magnetic nanoparticles. Magnetic force microscopy 5 and x-ray photoemission electron microscopy 6 have provided experimental evidence of dipolar ferromagnetic ordering in nanoparticle assemblies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%