2005
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2005/03/p03001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dipolar stochastic Loewner evolutions

Abstract: We present basic properties of dipolar stochastic Loewner evolutions, a new version of stochastic Loewner evolutions (SLEs) in which the critical interfaces end randomly on an interval of the boundary of a planar domain. We present a general argument explaining why correlation functions of models of statistical mechanics are expected to be martingales and we give a relation between dipolar SLEs and conformal field theories (CFTs). We compute SLE excursion and/or visiting probabilities, including the probabilit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suppose (Ω δ , B δ ) approximate (Ω, B), where B stands for +/ − / + / free boundary conditions. Then the probability that there is a + crossing between (b δ 2 a δ 2 ) and (a δ 1 b δ 1 ) (respectively, − crossing between (a δ 2 a δ 1 ) and (b δ 1 b δ 2 )) tends to 1 − G +/−/+/free (λ) (respectively, G +/−/+/free (λ)), where The formula (4.4) was conjectured in [BBK05] and proved in [Izy11], and (4.5) follows from the result of [HK13] and a calculation in [BBH05]. We do not know explicit formulae for other boundary conditions.…”
Section: Explicit Expressions For Observablesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Suppose (Ω δ , B δ ) approximate (Ω, B), where B stands for +/ − / + / free boundary conditions. Then the probability that there is a + crossing between (b δ 2 a δ 2 ) and (a δ 1 b δ 1 ) (respectively, − crossing between (a δ 2 a δ 1 ) and (b δ 1 b δ 2 )) tends to 1 − G +/−/+/free (λ) (respectively, G +/−/+/free (λ)), where The formula (4.4) was conjectured in [BBK05] and proved in [Izy11], and (4.5) follows from the result of [HK13] and a calculation in [BBH05]. We do not know explicit formulae for other boundary conditions.…”
Section: Explicit Expressions For Observablesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This approach, pursued in particular in [Smi01, LSW04, SS05, SS09, CN06, ChSm12, CDHKS13], was extremely fruitful. In a more general setup (e. g. for more complicated boundary conditions), the driving processes are typically described by Brownian motion B κt with time-dependent drifts; these processes do not admit such a simple axiomatic characterization anymore, and a lot of work has been done (see e. g. [LSW03,BBH05,BBK05,LK07,Dub07,Zha08,Dub09,IK13,FK13,KP14]) in order to understand them both in general and in relation to concrete lattice models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To define dipolar SLE [12] one specifies a boundary point, which is going to be the starting point of the trace, and a boundary interval not including the starting point, which is going to included the termination point of the trace. Then dipolar SLE describes curves starting on the specified boundary point and stopped the first instant they hit the specified boundary interval.…”
Section: Dipolar Slementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For κ ≥ 4, the probability that a dipolar SLE κ hull contains the bulk point z and the probability that it passes to the right of z can be computed (somewhat miraculously) again by routine martingale techniques by making the ansatz that they are harmonic functions of z and then checking that appropriate boundary conditions can be imposed, see again [10]. But the harmonic ansatz fails for κ < 4.…”
Section: An Elementary Application At κ =mentioning
confidence: 99%