Calcite (CaCO 3 ), magnesite (MgCO 3 ) and dolomite (CaMg(CO 3 ) 2 ) are trigonal carbonate salts and constitute the calcite group. The activation volumes for electric charge transport in these materials were obtained from conductivity experiments at various pressure values [1][2][3][4][5]. It was suggested recently that a systematic trend of the activation volume with the volume of the unit cell occurs [5]. On the other hand, electrical and dielectric measurements have been reported for the entire set of the calcite type crystals previously [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The conductivity mechanisms were studied in detail by using the Thermally Stimulated Depolarization Current (TSDC) spectroscopy. The analyses of the TSDC signals yielded the activation energy for the conductivity processes. The scope of the present work is to estimate the activation volumes from the activation energy values by means of the cBW model and compare them with the experimental values.Varotsos and Alexopoulos have suggested within the frame of the cBW model [14] that the activation volume can be calculated from the activation enthalpy h act and the elastic properties of the material through the following equation:where B denotes the isothermal bulk modulus and dB/dP is its pressure derivative. This model was successfully applied to many different materials [14]. The transport of charge carriers along the volume of the specimen produces TSDC peaks when non-ohmic electrodes are used. By analyzing those signals, the activation energies for the conductivity mechanisms can be obtained accurately [8,10,11]. However, the activation energy E obtained from electrical and dielectric measurements is identical with the activation enthalpy h act [14]. We can therefore replace the activation energy values and the elastic constants into Eq. (1), so as to calculate the values of the activation volume u act calc . The results are shown in Table 1, together with the experimentally determined activation volumes (which are simply labeled by u act ).We observe that the calculated activation volumes are in good agreement with the experimental ones. The divergence between the calculated and the experimental values is less than 6%. The phys. stat. sol. (b) 230, No. 2, R7-R8 (2002)