2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2173990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dipole and quadrupole moments of molecules in crystals: A novel approach based on integration over Hirshfeld surfaces

Abstract: Interaction-induced dipoles of hydrogen molecules colliding with helium atoms: A new ab initio dipole surface for high-temperature applications J. Chem. Phys. 136, 044320 (2012) Elegant expressions are derived for the computation of dipole and quadrupole moments of molecules using the electrostatic potential and electric field evaluated on an oriented molecular surface. These expressions are implemented for Hirshfeld surfaces, applied to various molecular crystals, and compared with the results from the quantu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, for a subset of molecules in Tables 1 and 2, we performed PHF calculations with CRYSTAL98 [20] using a polarized double zeta (DZP) basis set; [21] using the MOLSPLIT option yielded electron distributions arising from a sum of non-interacting molecules. Following the procedures outlined in detail elsewhere, [17] molecular dipole moments were obtained using two distinctly different partitioning schemes to define molecular regions: Hirshfeld surfaces [16] and Bader's QTAM. [13] For the former case, the crystalline electric field and electrostatic potential were computed at points on Hirshfeld surfaces around each molecule, obtained at a resolution of 10 points/au, and surface integration was used to determine molecular dipole moments.…”
Section: Using Theory To Benchmark X-ray Diffraction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, for a subset of molecules in Tables 1 and 2, we performed PHF calculations with CRYSTAL98 [20] using a polarized double zeta (DZP) basis set; [21] using the MOLSPLIT option yielded electron distributions arising from a sum of non-interacting molecules. Following the procedures outlined in detail elsewhere, [17] molecular dipole moments were obtained using two distinctly different partitioning schemes to define molecular regions: Hirshfeld surfaces [16] and Bader's QTAM. [13] For the former case, the crystalline electric field and electrostatic potential were computed at points on Hirshfeld surfaces around each molecule, obtained at a resolution of 10 points/au, and surface integration was used to determine molecular dipole moments.…”
Section: Using Theory To Benchmark X-ray Diffraction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As remarked previously for glycine, [17] amino acids such as this that exist in zwitterionic form in the crystal generate large electric fields because of their substantial dipole moments, but this does not translate into very large dipole enhancements, principally because the molecules are already highly polarized. We elaborate a little further on this observation below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[52,53] In the case of a non-symmetric molecule, such as 1, the six components of the second moment tensor are all independent and their relationship to charge contraction/expansion along a particular direction defined by some structural elements (e.g., a bond axis) is not as straightforward as in simpler cases. [46,52,54] …”
Section: Atomic and Molecular Volumesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By considering the QTAIM value as the best experimental estimate of the dipole moment and the MCG-B3LYP value as the reference, the dipole moment enhancement, occurring upon crystallisation as a consequence of both crystal field effects and intermolecular interactions, is about 87 %, whereas, with respect to the MOG-B3LYP value, the enhancement is reduced to 48 %, again high, but quite close to the range of 30-40 % reported in the literature as typical for hydrogen-bonded systems. [46,47] In an attempt to calculate the ab initio value of m in the crystal, we performed fully periodic DFT calculations on the 17 K experimental geometry with the CRYSTAL2003 program. [30] However, as this version of the code (the only one that can handle a structure as large as 1) does not include QTAIM analysis of the electron density, we could only derive a value for the dipole moment from the periodic Mulliken DMA, as retrieved from the wavefunction of the CRYSTAL2003 program by the code PAMoC.…”
Section: Atomic and Molecular Volumesmentioning
confidence: 99%