1986
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(86)80401-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dipole moments of electronically excited states of 4-N,N-dimethylaminobenzonitrile and related compounds deduced from transient dielectric losses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was in contrast to the conclusion of Visser et al in their study of exciplexes between DMABN and 1,4-dioxane solvent, which were ascribed to 1:1 solute−solvent twisted exciplexes …”
Section: Referencescontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was in contrast to the conclusion of Visser et al in their study of exciplexes between DMABN and 1,4-dioxane solvent, which were ascribed to 1:1 solute−solvent twisted exciplexes …”
Section: Referencescontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…A more direct technique, transient microwave conductivity, has been used by Fessenden et al and Visser et al to measure excited-state dipole moments including those of some exciplexes. As in the case of the electrooptical technique, dipole moments tend to be lower than those estimated from solvatochromic shifts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dipole moment is determined by experiment in the range between 5.8 D (electrooptical measurements) and 11.4 D (solvatochromic results) . The reliable transient electron loss method yields 9.11 D, which is in excellent agreement with the STEOM-CCSD value of 9.16 D. The CASPT2 dipole moment of 7.6 D 12 is located at the lower, and the DFT/SCI value of 11.5 D 15 at the upper limit, of the experimental range. In general, also the efficient DFT/SCI method yields comparable results: Both the exitation energies (4.05 eV (S 1 ) and 4.56 eV (S 2 )) and oscillator strengths (0.027 (S 1 ) and 0.658 (S 2 )) are of high quality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Several models for the explanation of this unusual behavior have been subsequently proposed, but the photophysics of this phenomenon has most frequently been discussed within the twisted intramolecular charge transfer (TICT) model by Z. R. Grabowski and co-workers. , In this model, the highly polar charge transfer excited state is formed by internal twisting of the donor (dimethylamino subunit) relatively to the acceptor (benzonitrile subunit) in the excited state. Nevertheless, several other models, as complexation or formation of exciplexes with the solvent or solvent-induced vibronic coupling between the energetically close lying first singlet states, , are still discussed as possible explanations.
1 Structures of ABN (left) and DMABN (right).
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Description of this specific solute−solvent interaction as a three-electron bond to the solvent lone pair was also suggested by Wang . Later, the group of Varma, continuing to support the exciplex hypothesis, withdrew from the concept of an intermediate planar exciplex 9 Scheme of terms in the exciplex with the solvent, as proposed by Varma et al Lone pairs of the solute molecule, n m , and of the solvent, n s , interact, which results in a splitting (λ 1 , λ 2 ).…”
Section: Exciplexes With the Solvent mentioning
confidence: 93%