“…For instance, CVFR assessment was performed only in 116 out of the 146 vasodilator stresses. This is mainly due to the fact that dipyridamole SE was used for the first time in these patients in the early nineties, in the "firstgeneration" SE based only on wall motion analysis [7,21]. As data showing the key prognostic role of microvascular impairment in these patients became available over the next decade, and as the ultrasound imaging technology evolved and matured allowing the Doppler evaluation of left anterior descending artery in the last 15 years, the "second generation" vasodilator SE allowed to include the assessment of CFVR by different recruiting centers, some of which focused exclusively on CFVR, whereas others used the dual imaging (wall motion and CFVR) protocol.…”