2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2022.115083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct acetylation for full analysis of polysaccharides in edible plants and fungi using reverse phase liquid chromatography-multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monosaccharide composition analysis is the basis for studying the structural properties and the structure–activity relationships of polysaccharides. Common analytical methods for determining monosaccharide composition currently include liquid chromatography [ 10 ], liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry ( Figure 8 ) [ 97 ], gas chromatography [ 64 ] and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry [ 41 ]. A large number of studies have concluded that the chemical modification of natural polysaccharides generally leads to changes in the molar percentage of monosaccharide composition, but it does not lead to changes in monosaccharide composition [ 42 , 64 , 77 , 82 ].…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Bioactivity Of Chemically Modified Pol...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Monosaccharide composition analysis is the basis for studying the structural properties and the structure–activity relationships of polysaccharides. Common analytical methods for determining monosaccharide composition currently include liquid chromatography [ 10 ], liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry ( Figure 8 ) [ 97 ], gas chromatography [ 64 ] and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry [ 41 ]. A large number of studies have concluded that the chemical modification of natural polysaccharides generally leads to changes in the molar percentage of monosaccharide composition, but it does not lead to changes in monosaccharide composition [ 42 , 64 , 77 , 82 ].…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Bioactivity Of Chemically Modified Pol...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b1 : Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide; b2 : Auricularia auricular-judae polysaccharide; b3 : Armillaria mellea polysaccharide; b4 : Hericium erinaceus polysaccharide; b5 : Panax ginseng polysaccharide; b6 : Aralia elata bud polysaccharide; b7 : Platycodon grandiflorum polysaccharide; b8 : Stigma maydis polysaccharide. This figure was adapted from Gao et al [ 97 ].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods involve multiple enzymes, increasing the complexity and cost . Additionally, mass spectrometry has been designed to identify acetylation substrate residues, but it requires expensive instrument and complicated procedures . Various immunoassays have also been developed by combining with different biosensing mechanisms, for example, chemiluminescence, fluorescence resonance energy transfer, and colorimetric assays. However, the high cost and unsatisfactory sensitivity remain significant barriers, especially when analyzing low-abundance acetylation-related enzymes in complex microenvironments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process often involves full monosaccharide liberation, derivative reaction and qualitative or quantitative elucidation of the derivatives with available separation and detection techniques, among which GC–MS is one of the mainstream methods for the derivatization identification of monosaccharides (Ruiz‐Matute et al, 2011; Xia et al, 2018). Based on the previous reports, aldononitrile acetylation, alditol acetylation, direct acetylation and other analytical methods have been diffusely employed for analyzing monosaccharide components by GC–MS (Gao et al, 2023; Liang et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2007). Silylation and trifluoroacetylation, both also combined with prior oximation, have also been reported for GC analysis (Konig et al, 1988; Rojas‐Escudero et al, 2004; Sullivan & Schewe, 1977; Zweckmair et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%