2014 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion 2014
DOI: 10.1109/speedam.2014.6872091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct active and reactive power control of DFIG based wind energy conversion system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of stator flux in the power control made disturbances on the output voltage V s and frequency while the stator flux has to be constant ( φ s = V s / ω s ) to guarantee a permanent connection of the wind generator to the AC grid, where the conditions of connection to the AC grid are: the same voltages, the same frequencies and the same succession of phases. On other side, the DPC suffers from many disadvantages, therefore, some authors have replaced the hysteresis regulators and the switching table by an artificial intelligence technique (Fuzzy Logic Control or Artificial Neural Network) [14][15][16][17]. Some other authors have used Multi-Level converter or Matrix converter instead of the classical two-level converter [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of stator flux in the power control made disturbances on the output voltage V s and frequency while the stator flux has to be constant ( φ s = V s / ω s ) to guarantee a permanent connection of the wind generator to the AC grid, where the conditions of connection to the AC grid are: the same voltages, the same frequencies and the same succession of phases. On other side, the DPC suffers from many disadvantages, therefore, some authors have replaced the hysteresis regulators and the switching table by an artificial intelligence technique (Fuzzy Logic Control or Artificial Neural Network) [14][15][16][17]. Some other authors have used Multi-Level converter or Matrix converter instead of the classical two-level converter [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field oriented control still the most commonly used control for DFIG system by using the classic Proportional Integral (PI) regulators 5,6 . However, this method is more complex and difficult to maintain desired performances because it requires many parameters of the motor 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed structure of fuzzy direct power controlIn this control scheme, the hysteresis controllers are replaced by fuzzy logic controllers (FLC) however, it uses the same concept as DPC for the selection of the switching vector. The inputs to the FLC are the errors of real and reactive power ( , ) and their variations ( , ) and the output of the FLC is the actual voltage vector applied to the GSC93,6 . inference method used is based on Mamdani min-max rule.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, DPC technique has been put forward for the wind energy conversation systems including DFIG [18–20]. In [18], the rotor flux is calculated from the rotor and stator parameters at each sampling period; hence, stability and robustness of this technique completely depend on machine parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The switching frequency of the converter is affected by power and speed variations as well. In [19], the control system has been constructed based on the active and reactive power errors as well as the stator‐flux position. As the stator‐voltage waveform is relatively pure sinusoidal with a constant frequency, the estimated stator‐flux accuracy has been guaranteed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%