2017
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.1615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Adaptive Fuzzy Backstepping Control for Stochastic Nonlinear SISO Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics

Abstract: This paper discusses the input‐to‐state practical stability (ISpS) problem for a class of stochastic strict‐feedback systems which possess dynamic disturbances, unstructured uncertainties and unmodeled dynamics. The uncertain terms not only depend on the measurable output, but also are related with other unmeasurable states of the system. In the backstepping design, we use fuzzy logic systems directly to approach unknown control signals rather than unknown functions. A main advantage of the direct control meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, the aim is to elaborate an adequate controller ensuring the following control objectives: 1) unitary power factor (UPF) in grid-side; 2) tight dc-bus voltage regulation; 3) safety battery charge (during G2V mode) and battery discharge (duringV2G mode); 4) asymptotic stability of the closed loop system. As the studied system model (1a-e) is nonlinear, a backstepping design technique is used [9,17]. The controller design will be carried out in two stages: bidirectional ac-dc power converter controller design and bidirectional dc-dc power converter controller design.…”
Section: State Feedback Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, the aim is to elaborate an adequate controller ensuring the following control objectives: 1) unitary power factor (UPF) in grid-side; 2) tight dc-bus voltage regulation; 3) safety battery charge (during G2V mode) and battery discharge (duringV2G mode); 4) asymptotic stability of the closed loop system. As the studied system model (1a-e) is nonlinear, a backstepping design technique is used [9,17]. The controller design will be carried out in two stages: bidirectional ac-dc power converter controller design and bidirectional dc-dc power converter controller design.…”
Section: State Feedback Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many tracking control methods have been proposed, such as PID control [1], computed-torque control [2], decentralized control [3], feedback linearization (otherwise known as inverse dynamics control) [4], adaptive control [5], intelligent control (fuzzy control [6], neural-network control [7]), optimal control [8], H ∞ control, [9] iterative learning control [10], model predictive control [11], passive-based control [12], adaptive neural network control [13,14], robust control [15], and sliding-mode control (SMC) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Among the methods, SMC has attracted significant interest due to its computational simplicity for implementation, high robustness to external disturbances, low sensitivity to parameter variations, and fast dynamic response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation studies demonstrate that the control accuracy is improved obviously compared with the PID method. The fuzzy control method is an efficient control strategy and the stability analysis of fuzzy control systems has achieved some results . Traore et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation studies demonstrate that the control accuracy is improved obviously compared with the PID method. The fuzzy control method is an efficient control strategy and the stability analysis of fuzzy control systems has achieved some results [13][14][15][16][17]. Traore et al [6] proposed a fuzzy control method to track the DO concentration in a sequencing batch reactor pilot plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%