1995
DOI: 10.1021/j100013a051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Analyses of an Electrochemically Induced Dye Formation Reaction across a Single-Microdroplet/Water Interface

Abstract: The rate and the yield of the cyan dye formation reaction in single microdroplets dispersed in water were determined for the first time by a laser trapping-spectroscopy -electrochemistry method. The rate-determining step was shown to be the interfacial coupling reaction between electrochemically generated 4-N,N-diethyl-2-methylquinonediimine (QDI) in the water phase and a phenol derivative in an oil droplet. The dye formation efficiency in an individual droplet was also demonstrated to be controlled by the dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest solid experimental curve was obtained in the absence of TCNQ in the DCE phase and the corresponding dashed curve is the theory for negative feedback [194]. www.scilet.com 130 oxidation process. In contrast, the ET rate increased with driving force when this was adjusted via the redox potential of the aqueous oxidant.…”
Section: Oxidation Of Organic-phase Decamethylferrocene By Aqueous Oxmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lowest solid experimental curve was obtained in the absence of TCNQ in the DCE phase and the corresponding dashed curve is the theory for negative feedback [194]. www.scilet.com 130 oxidation process. In contrast, the ET rate increased with driving force when this was adjusted via the redox potential of the aqueous oxidant.…”
Section: Oxidation Of Organic-phase Decamethylferrocene By Aqueous Oxmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…LASER-TRAPPED DROPS Electrochemical measurements have been performed at microdroplets trapped by a laser beam to facilitate positioning on [124][125][126][127][128] or adjacent to [129][130][131][132][133] an UME. Compared to stirred tank techniques [3] which only allow g) Si-Xuan Guo, Patrick R. Unwin, Anna L. Whitworth and Jie Zhang www.scilet.com 60 measurements of the average behaviour of droplets dispersed in a solution, the ability to focus on a single droplet, opens up the possibility of investigating sizedependence effects on the kinetics of chemical processes [134].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,26,32 Other important effects are from the accelerated electron transfer and molecular configuration of chemicals at the interface with asymmetric environment on each side. 22,33 The interfacial molecules are activated from solvation with lower energy barrier for the reaction and faster kinetics. 34,35 Though multiple possible mechanisms were proposed to interpret the accelerated kinetics, however, the quantitative analysis based on tracing in-situ droplet reaction is still missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nakatani and coworkers found that electron transfer was accelerated at droplet surface. [26][27][28] Furthermore, Fallah-Araghi et al 22 demonstrated that the reaction rate is inversely proportional to the droplet radius, related to the preference of product adsorption and desorption at the droplet interface that accelerates the rate and shifts the balance of the chemical reaction. 22 The active energy barrier was found to be negligible for the reactions within droplets, possibly due to the molecular configuration of reactants at the droplet surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%