2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-011-0755-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct analysis of biogenic amines in water matrix by modified capillary zone electrophoresis with 18-crown-6

Abstract: We report on a method for the determination of the biogenic amines (BAs) spermine, spermidine, histamine, cadaverine, β-phenylethylamine, tyramine and tryptamine. It is based on capillary zone electrophoresis in the presence of 18-crown-6 (180 mM), and is making use of amperometric detection. Under optimized conditions, seven BAs could be well separated within 29 min at a separation voltage of 14 kV in a buffer solution of pH 3.6. The limits of detection for seven BAs are around 10 ng.mL −1 for standard mixtur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among analyzed biogenic amines, putrescine and cadaverine were found to be good indicators of freshness because their levels rapidly increased during the process of meat aging. Better LODs (10–42 μg/L) were obtained in the analysis of seven unlabeled biogenic amines (spermine, spermidine, histamine, cadaverine, β‐phenylethylamine, tyramine, and tryptamine) by using CZE with amperometric detection (AD) . Several additives were tested to improve biogenic amine separation.…”
Section: Amino Acids Biogenic Amines and Other Hazardous Aminesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among analyzed biogenic amines, putrescine and cadaverine were found to be good indicators of freshness because their levels rapidly increased during the process of meat aging. Better LODs (10–42 μg/L) were obtained in the analysis of seven unlabeled biogenic amines (spermine, spermidine, histamine, cadaverine, β‐phenylethylamine, tyramine, and tryptamine) by using CZE with amperometric detection (AD) . Several additives were tested to improve biogenic amine separation.…”
Section: Amino Acids Biogenic Amines and Other Hazardous Aminesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of standard mixture solutions of the six amines were tested under the optimal conditions to determine the linearity of this method. As listed in Table , the LODs of this method (S/N = 3) were 6.15–68.32 nM, which were approximately 100‐fold lower than those reported in several previous studies . Compared with the common CE‐AD method (Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…M. Liu and Cheng 2003;Sun et al 2003;Wang et al 2003;Chu et al 2006;Gong and Hauser 2006;Kvasnicka and Voldrich 2006;M. Li and Lee 2007;Li 2012) and derivatization approaches (Wintersteiger et al 1995;Asan and Isildak 1999;Gao et al 2011;Kang et al 2011), the LODs based on field-amplified sample injection were superior (1,2-diaminoethane: 0.013 ng=mL vs. 10 nM vs. 0.18 ng=mL; 1,6-diaminohexane: 0.11 ng=mL vs. 7.6 mM vs. 0.46 ng=mL), and the sensitivity was improved between 10 and 1000 times.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although these methods are convenient and simple, sample pretreatment is usually required to reduce interferences. Thus far, only a few detection methods have been reported for the determination of several biogenic amines in food based on conventional CE coupled with amperometric detection (AD) ; W. L. Li et al 2012), pulsed amperometric detection (Sun, Yang, and Wang 2003), conductometric detection (Kvasnick and Voldrich 2006), contactless conductivity detection (Gong and Hauser 2006), and chemiluminescence detection (J. F. Liu, Yang, and Wang 2003;Y. M. Liu and Cheng 2003;M.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%