2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00341g.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct and airborne contact dermatitis from propolis in beekeepers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we performed biotransformation experiments with 50% PEG 400 instead of ethanol, and we observed a significant improvement in the reduction of caffeic acid esters. Precisely, under our experimental conditions (i.e., 1 g of propolis in 2 ml of 50% PEG 400), 10 11 bacterial cells reduced the allergenic molecules by 61% ( Fig. 2 and Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, we performed biotransformation experiments with 50% PEG 400 instead of ethanol, and we observed a significant improvement in the reduction of caffeic acid esters. Precisely, under our experimental conditions (i.e., 1 g of propolis in 2 ml of 50% PEG 400), 10 11 bacterial cells reduced the allergenic molecules by 61% ( Fig. 2 and Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Besides the numerous above-mentioned positive effects, propolis, though seemingly relatively safe (calculated safe dose, ϳ1.4 mg per kg of body weight per day in humans [5]), may have adverse effects, such as xerostomia, gastric pain, and allergic eczematous contact dermatitis, in apiarists (10) and in consumers with an allergic predisposition (23). Less than 10% of the population is sensitive to propolis (sensitization rate, 1.2 to 6%); nevertheless, a significant increasing trend in sensitization has been observed in adolescents in recent decades (from 2 to 13.7% in the period 1995 to 2002) (15), possibly as a consequence of a considerably augmented use of propolis in numerous commercial products.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, allergic reactions have been described in several case reports. In Spain, Fernández et al [304] have reported three cases in beekeepers of occupational contact sensitization to propolis, with varied features, and considered that propolis a direct and an airborne contact allergen. Allergic contact stomatitis in two cases caused by propolis administrated for therapeutic purposes, were signaled by the same group of research Fernández et al [305] and Cabanillas et al [306] Fernández et al [305] declared that the compounds 3-methyl-2-butenyl caffeate, phenylethyl caffeate, benzyl salicylate and benzyl cinnamate found in propolis composition, are main causes of this allergy.…”
Section: Propolis Allergymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De nombreux cas de dermatoses de contact ont été rapportés dans un cadre professionnel [17] ou chez des apiculteurs [8,14]. Pasolini et al [39] rapportent un cas de chéilite allergique de contact chez une personne qui consommait du miel enrichi en propolis.…”
Section: Pollensunclassified
“…Parmi la cinquantaine de constituants identifiés dans la propolis, les principaux agents sensibilisants sont le 3-methyl-2-butenyl caffeate et phenylethyl caffeate [17]. La dermatite est liée au contact direct avec la propolis, mais aussi à l'exposition aux allergènes aéroportés qui en sont issus [8].…”
Section: Pollensunclassified