2021
DOI: 10.3390/nano11112889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct and Indirect Genotoxicity of Graphene Family Nanomaterials on DNA—A Review

Abstract: Graphene family nanomaterials (GFNs), including graphene, graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO), and graphene quantum dots (GQDs), have manifold potential applications, leading to the possibility of their release into environments and the exposure to humans and other organisms. However, the genotoxicity of GFNs on DNA remains largely unknown. In this review, we highlight the interactions between DNA and GFNs and summarize the mechanisms of genotoxicity induced by GFNs. Generally, the genotoxicity c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have also shown that exposure to graphene oxide and rGONR-PEG caused concentration and size-dependent DNA damage in different cancer cells including human ovarian cancer cells, human Glioblastoma multiforme cells (GBMU87), human alveolar adenocarcinoma cells (A549), CaCO2 and Vero cell lines [51,[60][61][62][63], suggesting that GO and GO-PEG have genotoxic effects on cells, depending on their nature and treatment protocols. These results signified that the cyto-and genotoxicity of graphene materials should be carefully studied before combining with the other therapeutic approaches such as photothermal therapy [64]. Our studies demonstrated that PEGylation of GO alone and in combination with NIR had none to little DNA damaging activity in Colon26 and HT29 cells, respectively, after 24 h of cultivation and higher genotoxicity after 72 h of cultivation.…”
Section: Insignificant Genotoxicity Of Go-peg Nps In Combination With Nir For Colon26 and Ht29 Cells After 24 H Of Cultivationmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Previous studies have also shown that exposure to graphene oxide and rGONR-PEG caused concentration and size-dependent DNA damage in different cancer cells including human ovarian cancer cells, human Glioblastoma multiforme cells (GBMU87), human alveolar adenocarcinoma cells (A549), CaCO2 and Vero cell lines [51,[60][61][62][63], suggesting that GO and GO-PEG have genotoxic effects on cells, depending on their nature and treatment protocols. These results signified that the cyto-and genotoxicity of graphene materials should be carefully studied before combining with the other therapeutic approaches such as photothermal therapy [64]. Our studies demonstrated that PEGylation of GO alone and in combination with NIR had none to little DNA damaging activity in Colon26 and HT29 cells, respectively, after 24 h of cultivation and higher genotoxicity after 72 h of cultivation.…”
Section: Insignificant Genotoxicity Of Go-peg Nps In Combination With Nir For Colon26 and Ht29 Cells After 24 H Of Cultivationmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…As previously mentioned, DNA damage induced by oxidative stress is a well-established mechanism of action of GBMs [ 29 ]; however, GO (and also GNPs) reported positive results in the standard comet assay but negative ones in the Fpg-modified comet assay [ 70 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the case of other nanomaterials, oxidative stress mediated by ROS generation is one of the main indirect mechanisms of GBMs’ genotoxicity [ 29 ]. For instance, ROS-dependent DNA damage (detected by the comet assay) was observed in human retinal pigment epithelium ARPE-19 cells after 24 h exposure to GO and rGO [ 68 ].…”
Section: Identification Of Gaps and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As explained in one of the reviews included in this Special Issue, the number and quantity of nanomaterials is ever increasing and affecting the environment where humans, bacteria, and plants live, and their genome come in contact with nanomaterials [3]. Although the topic of genotoxicity induced by nanomaterials is important, we had only five contributions for this Special Issue: [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Marmiroli et al, 2022 [3], contributed a minireview on the methods used to analyze genotoxicity in plants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%