1993
DOI: 10.1016/0141-5425(93)90062-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct and indirect methods for the quantification of leg volume: comparison between water displacement volumetry, the disk model method and the frustum sign model method, using the correlation coefficient and the limits of agreement

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
46
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Water displacement devices are the ‘gold standard’ and have been studied intensively for leg lymphoedema18–21. The decrease in water was assessed after displacement, a method that has been validated for arm swelling and measures the volume of the arm including the hand22.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water displacement devices are the ‘gold standard’ and have been studied intensively for leg lymphoedema18–21. The decrease in water was assessed after displacement, a method that has been validated for arm swelling and measures the volume of the arm including the hand22.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies that indirect volume measurements methods are not interchangeable with water a displacement method. The gold standard for the measurement of limb swelling is the water displacement method [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of the severity of edema and of its functional consequences might improve the prevention and management of venous leg ulcers. Some reliable methods are presently available to quantify leg edema [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. Among them, several studies concurred to suggest that the evaluation of the biomechanical properties of skin might provide sound information in this field [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%