2022
DOI: 10.21883/pss.2022.14.54338.185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct and inverse magnetoelectric effect in orthorhombic single crystals of Dy-=SUB=-1-x-=/SUB=-Ho-=SUB=-x-=/SUB=-MnO-=SUB=-3-=/SUB=-

Abstract: In this work, the magnetoelectric response in a series of Dy1-xHoxMnO3 crystals with substitution x from 0 to 0.4 was investigated. The measurement results showed that, as x increases, a decrease in both the polarization Pa and the magnitude of the susceptibility of the inverse magnetoelectric effect αba is observed. In addition, the field Hb increases, at which the P_c-> Pa transition is observed, and the temperature range of the existence of the magnetoelectric response decreases. Thus, an increase in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 also shows the measurements of P(E) for the Dy 1−x Ho x MnO 3 sample with x = 0.3. As the chart shows, the hysteresis for this compound is not observed, meaning the suppression of ferroelectricity as the concentration of Ho 3+ ions increases; nevertheless, the given compound with x = 0.3 still had the weak direct and reverse magnetoelectric effects [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 also shows the measurements of P(E) for the Dy 1−x Ho x MnO 3 sample with x = 0.3. As the chart shows, the hysteresis for this compound is not observed, meaning the suppression of ferroelectricity as the concentration of Ho 3+ ions increases; nevertheless, the given compound with x = 0.3 still had the weak direct and reverse magnetoelectric effects [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…2, c). The latter means that the second harmonic, which is actually recorded in the experiment [15,16], cannot be explained by the polarization hysteresis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%