1995
DOI: 10.1016/0301-6226(95)00071-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct and maternal (co) variance components and heritability estimates for body weight at different ages and fleece traits in Afrino sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

34
66
13
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
34
66
13
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimate of the direct heritability of weaning weight in the present study (0.14, model 5) was similar to the findings of Snyman et al (1995), Abegaz et al (2002), Matika et al (2003), and Ozcan et al (2005) in different breeds of sheep. However, higher heritability estimates for weaning weight as compared to those from the present study were reported by other workers in various sheep breeds (Snyman et al 1995;Notter 1998;El Fadili et al 2000;Assan et al 2002;Gizaw et al 2007), and lower heritabilities for this trait were reported by Notter (1998) in Polypay sheep (0.07) and Ekiz et al (2004) in Turkish Merino sheep (0.06).…”
Section: Weaning Weightsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The estimate of the direct heritability of weaning weight in the present study (0.14, model 5) was similar to the findings of Snyman et al (1995), Abegaz et al (2002), Matika et al (2003), and Ozcan et al (2005) in different breeds of sheep. However, higher heritability estimates for weaning weight as compared to those from the present study were reported by other workers in various sheep breeds (Snyman et al 1995;Notter 1998;El Fadili et al 2000;Assan et al 2002;Gizaw et al 2007), and lower heritabilities for this trait were reported by Notter (1998) in Polypay sheep (0.07) and Ekiz et al (2004) in Turkish Merino sheep (0.06).…”
Section: Weaning Weightsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The estimate of permanent environmental maternal effect (c 2 ) for birth weight (0.09) in our study was in agreement with the findings of Maria et al (1993) and Mandal et al (2006) in other sheep breeds. However, the estimates reported by Tosh and Kemp (1994) in Hampshire, Polled Dorset, and Romanov sheep; Snyman et al (1995) in Afrino sheep; Neser et al (2001) in Dorper sheep; and Ekiz et al (2004) in Turkish Merino lambs were higher as compared to the present findings. The permanent environmental effect (c 2 ) due to the dam can be ascribed to uterine environmental effects and the feeding level in late gestation of the ewe (Maria et al 1993;Snyman et al 1995).…”
Section: Birth Weightcontrasting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations