2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.01.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct and quantitative AFM measurements of the concentration and temperature dependence of the hydrophobic force law at nanoscopic contacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…l Hy for hydrophobic surfaces is expected to be between 3 to 10 Å; 27 Stock et al showed that it is close to 7.2 AE 1.2 Å. 21 Our findings of l Hy = 7 to 8 Å for the hydrophobic region of X SO 3 H o 0.4 compare well to the literature values. In the intermediate region, i.e.…”
Section: Nanoscale Surface and Solvent Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…l Hy for hydrophobic surfaces is expected to be between 3 to 10 Å; 27 Stock et al showed that it is close to 7.2 AE 1.2 Å. 21 Our findings of l Hy = 7 to 8 Å for the hydrophobic region of X SO 3 H o 0.4 compare well to the literature values. In the intermediate region, i.e.…”
Section: Nanoscale Surface and Solvent Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In our previous work with longer hydrocarbon chains, we recorded weak repulsive contributions within the attractive regime, albeit not as pronounced an effect as reported here. 21 Similar short-range hydrophobic repulsion has been recently observed in experiments probing the hydrophobic force of diamond-like carbon. 24 Fig .…”
Section: Nanoscale Surface and Solvent Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several groups have studied the effect of surface temperature on the equilibrium contact angles either experimentally 12 16 , or even using molecular dynamic simulations 17 20 . However, there is still some disagreement between the authors about the dependency of the equilibrium contact angle on the system temperature for a given system pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9]), with a thickness of 0.7 nm suggested as an average [9,132]. A simple weighted average of the viscosity is shown to agree well with the numerical results: Although a conclusive law for hydrophobic interactions is yet to be achieved [286], an exponentially decaying behaviour is usually observed in direct measurements [287][288][289]. There has been also a longlasting debate on the range of hydrophobic interactions.…”
Section: Variation Of Viscosity µsupporting
confidence: 53%