M ultidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis is increasing worldwide (9, 27, 37). Rapid methods to detect drug resistance are needed to quickly identify drug-resistant strains and to implement appropriate therapy (4,16,36). M. tuberculosis does not naturally contain plasmids, and almost all cases of clinical drug resistance are caused by single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or small insertions/deletions in relevant genes (28). In the case of rifampin resistance, 95 to 98% of rifampin-resistant clinical strains have mutations in the 80-bp rifampin resistance determining region (RRDR) of the M. tuberculosis RNA polymerase beta (rpoB) gene (9,11,12,15,20,28). PCR and probe-based molecular genotyping assays can be used to detect these resistance-inducing mutations. Such genotypic assays are potentially more rapid than labor-intensive culture-based drug susceptibility tests. Genotypic drug susceptibility testing has shown good overall concordance with the phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility tests of MDR and XDR clinical strains (6), and in a recent study, a genotypic test actually correlated better with clinical outcome than standard phenotypic susceptibility testing (36). When combined with automated sample processing systems, such as the Xpert MTB/RIF test (14), genotypic susceptibility tests can significantly reduce testing turnaround time, increasing patient notification rates and decreasing time to treatment (4, 32).The Xpert MTB/RIF assay is one example of a genotypic test that is being increasingly used to screen for rifampin resistance (33). However, the single-use cartridge design of the Xpert assay limits its use for laboratory-based high-throughput testing. Several widely used reverse blot hybridization assays, such as the INNO-LIPA Rif.TB assay (Innogenetics, Belgium) and the MTBDRplus (Hain, Germany) assay (1,5,15,19,21,23,29,34), are available for laboratory-based rifampin resistance screening; however, these assays are complicated by their open hybridization format. Open hybridization systems require a relatively cumbersome work process, including rigorous physical separation of different work areas (2, 23) due to the risk of handling open PCR amplicons in a molecular diagnostic laboratory. Open systems also require a relatively large number of probes to test for relevant resistanceassociated mutations. This requirement complicates assay chemistry and hybridization parameters. In contrast to reverse blot hy-