2005
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.43.9.4880-4884.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Application of the INNO-LiPA Rif.TB Line-Probe Assay for Rapid Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Strains and Detection of Rifampin Resistance in 360 Smear-Positive Respiratory Specimens from an Area of High Incidence of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Abstract: The INNO-LiPA Rif.TB assay for the identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains and the detection of rifampin (RIF) resistance has been evaluated with 360 smear-positive respiratory specimens from an area of high incidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). The sensitivity when compared to conventional identification/culture methods was 82.2%, and the specificity was 66.7%; the sensitivity and specificity were 100.0% and 96.9%, respectively, for the detection of RIF resistance. This … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The test displays excellent specificity and good sensitivity, similar to those of other genetic tests for RIF resistance, such as line probe or molecular beacon tests (8,11,14,16,17). The observed discrepancies between the results of conventional DST and the TB-Biochip system (all were falsely called susceptible with the TB-Biochip system) likely result from the large number of mutations found in RIF-resistant isolates and the limited range of mutations included on the biochip.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The test displays excellent specificity and good sensitivity, similar to those of other genetic tests for RIF resistance, such as line probe or molecular beacon tests (8,11,14,16,17). The observed discrepancies between the results of conventional DST and the TB-Biochip system (all were falsely called susceptible with the TB-Biochip system) likely result from the large number of mutations found in RIF-resistant isolates and the limited range of mutations included on the biochip.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, the single-use cartridge design of the Xpert assay limits its use for laboratory-based high-throughput testing. Several widely used reverse blot hybridization assays, such as the INNO-LIPA Rif.TB assay (Innogenetics, Belgium) and the MTBDRplus (Hain, Germany) assay (1,5,15,19,21,23,29,34), are available for laboratory-based rifampin resistance screening; however, these assays are complicated by their open hybridization format. Open hybridization systems require a relatively cumbersome work process, including rigorous physical separation of different work areas (2,23) due to the risk of handling open PCR amplicons in a molecular diagnostic laboratory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because resistance to Rif is almost always accompanied by resistance to INH [10], resistance to Rif acts as a surrogate marker for identification of MDR-TB [10]. The presumptive identification of MDR-TB can be done within a single day [10] and this therefore can rapidly identify patients in the need of intensified therapy, whilst pan-susceptible infections can readily be managed with the four first line drugs recommended by the WHO. It should be stated that in some geographic areas with a high prevalence of MDR-TB, each case of tuberculosis is nowadays treated more intensively with second line drugs [11].…”
Section: General Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of resistance to Rif is afforded by the identification of mutations within the beta subunit of the rpoB gene [9]. Because resistance to Rif is almost always accompanied by resistance to INH [10], resistance to Rif acts as a surrogate marker for identification of MDR-TB [10]. The presumptive identification of MDR-TB can be done within a single day [10] and this therefore can rapidly identify patients in the need of intensified therapy, whilst pan-susceptible infections can readily be managed with the four first line drugs recommended by the WHO.…”
Section: General Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%